Wearables for Monitoring and Postural Feedback in the Work Context: A Scoping Review
- PMID: 38400498
- PMCID: PMC10893004
- DOI: 10.3390/s24041341
Wearables for Monitoring and Postural Feedback in the Work Context: A Scoping Review
Abstract
Wearables offer a promising solution for simultaneous posture monitoring and/or corrective feedback. The main objective was to identify, synthesise, and characterise the wearables used in the workplace to monitor and postural feedback to workers. The PRISMA-ScR guidelines were followed. Studies were included between 1 January 2000 and 22 March 2023 in Spanish, French, English, and Portuguese without geographical restriction. The databases selected for the research were PubMed®, Web of Science®, Scopus®, and Google Scholar®. Qualitative studies, theses, reviews, and meta-analyses were excluded. Twelve studies were included, involving a total of 304 workers, mostly health professionals (n = 8). The remaining studies covered workers in the industry (n = 2), in the construction (n = 1), and welders (n = 1). For assessment purposes, most studies used one (n = 5) or two sensors (n = 5) characterised as accelerometers (n = 7), sixaxial (n = 2) or nonaxialinertial measurement units (n = 3). The most common source of feedback was the sensor itself (n = 6) or smartphones (n = 4). Haptic feedback was the most prevalent (n = 6), followed by auditory (n = 5) and visual (n = 3). Most studies employed prototype wearables emphasising kinematic variables of human movement. Healthcare professionals were the primary focus of the study along with haptic feedback that proved to be the most common and effective method for correcting posture during work activities.
Keywords: feedback; posture; wearables; work-related musculoskeletal disorders; workstation.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Seeberg K.G.V., Andersen L.L., Bengtsen E., Sundstrup E. Effectiveness of workplace interventions in rehabilitating musculoskeletal disorders and preventing its consequences among workers with physical and sedentary employment: Systematic review protocol. Syst. Rev. 2019;8:1–7. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1127-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Ciccarelli M., Corradini F., Germani M., Menchi G., Mostarda L., Papetti A., Piangerelli M. SPECTRE: A deep learning network for posture recognition in manufacturing. J. Intell. Manuf. 2022;34:3469–3481. doi: 10.1007/s10845-022-02014-y. - DOI
-
- Lorenzini M., Ciotti S., Gandarias J.M., Fani S., Bianchi M., Ajoudani A. Performance Analysis of Vibrotactile and Slide-and-Squeeze Haptic Feedback Devices for Limbs Postural Adjustment; Proceedings of the 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication: Social, Asocial, and Antisocial Robots (RO-MAN); Napoli, Italy. 29–31 August 2022; pp. 707–713.
-
- Iñigo I., Lorenzo M. Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders: Prevalence, Costs and Demographics in the EU—Salud y Seguridad en el Trabajo—EU-OSHA. EU-OSHA; Luxembourg: 2020. 9789294791450.
-
- Cerqueira S.M., Da Silva A.F., Santos C.P. Smart Vest for Real-Time Postural Biofeedback and Ergonomic Risk Assessment. IEEE Access. 2020;8:107583–107592. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3000673. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
