Biochemical implications of robotic surgery: a new frontier in the operating room
- PMID: 38401027
- DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01861-6
Biochemical implications of robotic surgery: a new frontier in the operating room
Abstract
Robotic surgery represents a milestone in surgical procedures, offering advantages such as less invasive methods, elimination of tremors, scaled motion, and 3D visualization. This in-depth analysis explores the complex biochemical effects of robotic methods. The use of pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg positioning can decrease pulmonary compliance and splanchnic perfusion while increasing hypercarbia. However, robotic surgery reduces surgical stress and inflammation by minimizing tissue trauma. This contributes to faster recovery but may limit immune function. Robotic procedures also limit ischemia-reperfusion injury and oxidative damage compared to open surgery. They also help preserve native antioxidant defenses and coagulation. In a clinical setting, robotic procedures reduce blood loss, pain, complications, and length of stay compared to traditional procedures. However, risks remain, including device failure, the need for conversion to open surgery and increased costs. On the oncology side, there is still debate about margins, recurrence, and long-term survival. The advent of advanced technologies, such as intraoperative biosensors, localized drug delivery systems, and the incorporation of artificial intelligence, may further improve the efficiency of robotic surgery. However, ethical dilemmas regarding patient consent, privacy, access, and regulation of this disruptive innovation need to be addressed. Overall, this review sheds light on the complex biochemical implications of robotic surgery and highlights areas that require additional mechanistic investigation. It presents a comprehensive approach to responsibly maximize the potential of robotic surgery to improve patient outcomes, integrating technical skill with careful consideration of physiological and ethical issues.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Biochemical phenomena; Postoperative complications; Robotics; Surgery, computer-assisted.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Bliznakova K, Kolev N, Zlatarov A, Kalinov T, Georgiev T (2023) Feasibility and safety of robotic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes of a pilot study with da Vinci Xi platform during COVID-19. Chirurgia (Bucur) 118:27–38. https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.2688 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kerray F, Yule S (2021) Rise of the machines: human factors and training for robotic-assisted surgery. BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol 3:e000100. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000100 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Villalobos R, Maestre Y, González Barranquero A, Olsina J (2022) V-038 inguinal tep with articulated instruments: beyond conventional laparoscopy, closer to robotic surgery. Br J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac308.290 - DOI
-
- Kumar P, Talele S, Deshpande S, Ghyar R, Rout S, Ravi B (2023) Design, analysis and experimental validation of a novel 7-degrees of freedom instrument for laparoscopic surgeries. Ann Biomed Eng 51:751–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-022-03086-w - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kayani B, Haddad FS (2019) Robotic total knee arthroplasty: clinical outcomes and directions for future research. Bone Joint Res 8:438–442. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.810.BJR-2019-0175 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
