Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 24;15(1):1703.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45902-y.

KDM3B inhibitors disrupt the oncogenic activity of PAX3-FOXO1 in fusion-positive rhabdomyosarcoma

Affiliations

KDM3B inhibitors disrupt the oncogenic activity of PAX3-FOXO1 in fusion-positive rhabdomyosarcoma

Yong Yean Kim et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Fusion-positive rhabdomyosarcoma (FP-RMS) is an aggressive pediatric sarcoma driven primarily by the PAX3-FOXO1 fusion oncogene, for which therapies targeting PAX3-FOXO1 are lacking. Here, we screen 62,643 compounds using an engineered cell line that monitors PAX3-FOXO1 transcriptional activity identifying a hitherto uncharacterized compound, P3FI-63. RNA-seq, ATAC-seq, and docking analyses implicate histone lysine demethylases (KDMs) as its targets. Enzymatic assays confirm the inhibition of multiple KDMs with the highest selectivity for KDM3B. Structural similarity search of P3FI-63 identifies P3FI-90 with improved solubility and potency. Biophysical binding of P3FI-90 to KDM3B is demonstrated using NMR and SPR. P3FI-90 suppresses the growth of FP-RMS in vitro and in vivo through downregulating PAX3-FOXO1 activity, and combined knockdown of KDM3B and KDM1A phenocopies P3FI-90 effects. Thus, we report KDM inhibitors P3FI-63 and P3FI-90 with the highest specificity for KDM3B. Their potent suppression of PAX3-FOXO1 activity indicates a possible therapeutic approach for FP-RMS and other transcriptionally addicted cancers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Patent applications for compounds PFI-63 (P3FI-63) and PFI-90 (P3FI-90) have been filed. Applicant: United States of America as represented by the Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services. Inventors: J.K., R.G.H., G.M.W., M.L.P. Application numbers: US 17/777,552; CA 3,158,557; and EP 20824760.1. Status: Pending. Aspects of manuscript covered by patent: The compounds PFI-63 (P3FI-63) and PFI-90 (P3FI-90) are the subject of the patent application. Authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Identification and characterization of P3FI-63.
A Small molecule screen strategy to identify compounds that selectively inhibit PAX3-FOXO1-driven transcription B Top 64 compounds and their inhibitory characteristics of ALK super-enhancer-driven luciferase vs. CMV-driven luciferase (20 µM). C RNA-seq GSEA analysis of RH4 cells treated with compound P3FI-63. Normalized Enrichment Score (NES), False Discovery Rate (FDR). D Western validation of RNA-seq showing upregulation of MYOG and PARP cleavage (n = 1). E EC50 calculations of P3FI-63 on PAX3-FOXO1 positive RMS cell lines RH4, RH30, and SCMC. Data presented as mean values ± SEM. n = 3 biological replicates, error bar = Standard Error. F RNA-seq GSEA analysis of P3FI-63-treated RH4 cells reveal KDMs as possible targets. G Direct enzymatic inhibition assays of P3FI-63 against KDMs, HDACs, and PRMT5. Single experiment. H Western validation of KDM inhibition by P3FI-63 showing increases in methylation of H3K9me3, H3K4me3, and H3K27me3 (n = 1). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Characterization of P3FI-90.
A P3FI-90 structure compared to P3FI-63. B EC50 calculations for P3FI-90 on PAX3-FOXO1 positive RMS cell lines RH4, RH30, and SCMC. Data presented as mean values ± SEM. n = 3 biological replicates, error bar = Standard Error. C Direct enzymatic inhibition assays of P3FI-90 against KDMs, HDACs, and PRMT5 at 8 concentrations. Single Experiment. D Western validation of KDM inhibition showing increases in H3K9 and H3K4 methylation. One representative experiment from n = 2 is shown. E Left panel: Binding site of P3FI-90 (green) in KDM3B (PDB: 4c8d) overlaps with the binding site of the cofactor, 2-oxoglutarate (magenta). Middle panel: P3FI-90 docks well into the active site of KDM1A/LSD1 (PBD: 2Z3Y) forming hydrogen bonds with the main chain NH-groups of A331 and V-333. Pyridine moieties fit into hydrophobic pockets formed by the site chains of V-333, T335, A806, Tyr 761, L659, and Trp 751. Right panel: P3FI-90 alternative binding site on KDM3B that overlaps with N-phenyl-N’-pyridin3-yl-urea on KDM3B structure PDB:5RAZ and that is structurally similar to P3FI-90. The pocket is on the opposite side of the active site. In the alternative binding site, P3FI-90 forms hydrogen bonds with Ser1418, His 1394, and Glu1608. F RNA-seq GSEA analysis of RH4 cells treated with P3FI-90 showing downregulation of PAX3-FOXO1 target gene set, and upregulation of Apoptosis gene set. G Western validation of RNA-seq showing upregulation of MYOG and PARP cleavage. One representative experiment from n = 2 is shown. H Surface plasmon resonance show binding of P3FI-90 to KDM3B. KD of 7.68 × 10-6 M, Rmax of 130.5 RU, and Chi2 of 4.78. I Ligand-observed nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) technique WaterLOGSY (WL) with positive peaks showing P3FI-90 binding to KDM3B when KDM3B is present. N-Methyl-L-Valine (NMV) as non-binding control. J Ligand-observed NMR technique Carr-Purcell Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) showing attenuation in P3FI-90 peaks in the presence of KDM3B indicative of binding. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. CRISPR-based characterization of KDMs.
A CRISPR knockout with sgRNAs tiled across the entire KDM3B coding region. Analysis of fold depletion of sgRNAs as walking average of 4 sgRNAs. B RNA-seq TPM of KDMs after CRISPRi knockdown of KDMs. C Western validation of CRISPRi knockdown of KDMs. One representative experiment from n = 2 is shown. D GSEA analysis of RNA-seq data by P3FI-90 and KDM knockdowns. Refer to Supplementary Data 3, Tables 3–10 for Normalized Enrichment Scores (NES), p-values, and False Discovery Rates (FDR). E GSEA using P3FI90_UP and P3FI90_DOWN gene sets created using top 50 differentially expressed transcripts and F GSEA plots (Gene List on Supplementary Data 7, Table 3). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. scRNA-seq analysis of P3FI-90.
A UMAP of clusters after treatment with DMSO vs P3FI-90 for 16 h. B Cells in clusters as percent of total and as Log 2-fold change for P3FI-90 compared to DMSO. C Clusters ordered by average expression of Myoblast genes, Myocyte genes, and PAX3-FOXO1 target genes. n = 1 independent experiment; box plots of median and quartiles, whiskers showing 1.5 × interquartile ranges. Statics from GSEA analysis and adjusted for multiple testing by GSEA. D UMAP of clusters by cell cycle. E percentage quantitation of cell cycle overall, and G2M across clusters. F Flow cytometry of cell cycle in SCMC cell line after 24 h treatment with P3FI-90 at 1 µM. DMSO n = 3 biological replicates, P3FI-90 n = 2 biological replicates. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Histone methylation profile of P3FI-90.
A ChromHMM analysis of read counts at chromatin states for H3K4me3, H3K9me2, H3K27me3, H3K27ac, and PAX3-FOXO1. n = 1. B ChIP-seq of H3K4me3, H3K9me2, H3K27me3, H3K27ac, and PAX3-FOXO1 genome-wide analysis at transcription start sites (TSS) and PAX3-FOXO1 (P3F) binding sites. Showing one representative profile from n = 3 except H3K27me3 which is n = 1. C ChIP enrichment analysis (ChEA) of H3K9me2 differential peaks in RH4 cell line treated for 24 h with P3FI-90 (1 µM) vs DMSO, n = 3. *p = values can be found in supplementary Data 5, Table 2. ChEA analysis uses Fisher’s exact test. D Gene ontology analysis of H3K4me3 differential peaks (top 20%) 24 h after treatment with P3FI-90 (1 µM) vs DMSO, n = 3. Gene ontology uses Fisher’s exact test. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. RNA Pol2 analysis of P3FI-90.
A ChIP-seq of Total RNA Pol2, Pol2 Ser5, and Pol2 Ser2 from TSS to transcription end site (TES) genome-wide. n = 1. B ChIP-seq of Total RNA Pol2, Pol2 Ser5, and Pol2 Ser2 at enhancer sites. n = 1. C IGV track view of MYOD1 gene. Orange highlight for enhancer regions and green highlight for gene body. D GSEA of ranked differential peaks of RNA Pol2 after treatment with P3FI-90 vs DMSO showing negative enrichment of PAX3-FOXO1 core regulatory circuitry.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. Efficacy of P3FI-90 in metastatic and orthotopic models FP-RMS and pictorial depiction of P3FI-90 action in FP-RMS.
A In vivo xenograft model of metastatic FP-RMS showing delay in tumor progression when treated with P3FI-90 vs DMSO. Data presented as mean values ± SEM. n = 5 for DMSO and n = 4 for P3FI-90. *p = 0.0016 (2-way ANOVA). Error bar = Standard error. B In vivo xenograft model of orthotopic intramuscular FP-RMS. n = 4 and *p = 0.0046 (2-way ANOVA). Error bar = Standard error. C RNA-seq GSEA of a tumor isolated from in vivo subcutaneous xenograft model of FP-RMS after treatment with P3FI-90 vs DMSO. D Model of P3FI-90 action in FP-RMS. Left panel show active transcription of PAX3-FOXO1 target genes which is downregulated by inhibition of KDM3B by P3FI-90 resulting in increased methylation at H3K9. Right panel show disrupted transcription of apoptosis and myogenesis genes which becomes active due to inhibition of KDM1A by P3FI-90 resulting in increased methylation at H3K4. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

References

    1. Shern JF, Yohe ME, Khan J. Pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma. Crit. Rev. Oncog. 2015;20:227–243. doi: 10.1615/CritRevOncog.2015013800. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Parham DM, et al. Correlation between histology and PAX/FKHR fusion status in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2007;31:895–901. doi: 10.1097/01.pas.0000213436.99492.51. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sorensen PHB, et al. PAX3-FKHR and PAX7-FKHR gene fusions are prognostic indicators in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma: a report from the children’s oncology group. J. Clin. Oncol. 2002;20:2672–2679. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.03.137. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grobner SN, et al. The landscape of genomic alterations across childhood cancers. Nature. 2018;555:321–327. doi: 10.1038/nature25480. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gryder BE, et al. Chemical genomics reveals histone deacetylases are required for core regulatory transcription. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:3004. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11046-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms