Asystole on loop recorder in patients with unexplained syncope and negative tilt testing: age distribution and clinical predictors
- PMID: 38402334
- PMCID: PMC10944445
- DOI: 10.1007/s10286-024-01021-8
Asystole on loop recorder in patients with unexplained syncope and negative tilt testing: age distribution and clinical predictors
Abstract
Background: Approximately 50% of patients with unexplained syncope and negative head-up tilt test (HUTT) who have an electrocardiogram (ECG) documentation of spontaneous syncope during implantable loop recorder (ILR) show an asystolic pause at the time of the event.
Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the age distribution and clinical predictors of asystolic syncope detected by ILR in patients with unexplained syncope and negative HUTT.
Methods: This research employed a retrospective, single-center study of consecutive patients. The ILR-documented spontaneous syncope was classified according to the International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology (ISSUE) classification.
Results: Among 113 patients (54.0 ± 19.6 years; 46% male), 49 had an ECG-documented recurrence of syncope during the observation period and 28 of these later (24.8%, corresponding to 57.1% of the patients with a diagnostic event) had a diagnosis of asystolic syncope at ILR: type 1A was present in 24 (85.7%), type 1B in 1 (3.6%), and type 1C in 3 (10.7%) patients. The age distribution of asystolic syncope was bimodal, with a peak at age < 19 years and a second peak at the age of 60-79 years. At Cox multivariable analysis, syncope without prodromes (OR 3.7; p = 0.0008) and use of beta blockers (OR 3.2; p = 0.002) were independently associated to ILR-detected asystole.
Conclusions: In patients with unexplained syncope and negative HUTT, the age distribution of asystolic syncope detected by ILR is bimodal, suggesting a different mechanism responsible for asystole in both younger and older patients. The absence of prodromes and the use of beta blockers are independent predictors of ILR-detected asystole.
Keywords: Age; Asystole; Gender; Predictors; Syncope; Vasovagal syncope.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors did not report conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The Rate of Asystolic Reflex Syncope Is Not Influenced by Age.JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2024 Mar;10(3):566-574. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2023.11.021. Epub 2024 Jan 17. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2024. PMID: 38243997
-
The benefit of pacemaker therapy in patients with neurally mediated syncope and documented asystole: a meta-analysis of implantable loop recorder studies.Europace. 2018 Aug 1;20(8):1362-1366. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux321. Europace. 2018. PMID: 29267867
-
Mechanism of syncope without prodromes with normal heart and normal electrocardiogram.Heart Rhythm. 2017 Feb;14(2):234-239. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.08.046. Epub 2016 Sep 14. Heart Rhythm. 2017. PMID: 27639455
-
The implantable loop recorder-an important addition to the armentarium in the management of unexplained syncope.Ann Acad Med Singap. 2012 Mar;41(3):115-24. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2012. PMID: 22538738 Review.
-
Prevalence of asystole during tilt test-induced vasovagal syncope may depend on test methodology.Europace. 2023 Feb 16;25(2):263-269. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac154. Europace. 2023. PMID: 36796797 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Mechanism of syncope: role of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and cardiovascular autonomic function assessment.Eur Heart J. 2025 Mar 3;46(9):827-835. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae907. Eur Heart J. 2025. PMID: 39786439 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical