Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb;34(1):137-142.
doi: 10.1007/s10286-024-01021-8. Epub 2024 Feb 25.

Asystole on loop recorder in patients with unexplained syncope and negative tilt testing: age distribution and clinical predictors

Affiliations

Asystole on loop recorder in patients with unexplained syncope and negative tilt testing: age distribution and clinical predictors

Vincenzo Russo et al. Clin Auton Res. 2024 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Approximately 50% of patients with unexplained syncope and negative head-up tilt test (HUTT) who have an electrocardiogram (ECG) documentation of spontaneous syncope during implantable loop recorder (ILR) show an asystolic pause at the time of the event.

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the age distribution and clinical predictors of asystolic syncope detected by ILR in patients with unexplained syncope and negative HUTT.

Methods: This research employed a retrospective, single-center study of consecutive patients. The ILR-documented spontaneous syncope was classified according to the International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology (ISSUE) classification.

Results: Among 113 patients (54.0 ± 19.6 years; 46% male), 49 had an ECG-documented recurrence of syncope during the observation period and 28 of these later (24.8%, corresponding to 57.1% of the patients with a diagnostic event) had a diagnosis of asystolic syncope at ILR: type 1A was present in 24 (85.7%), type 1B in 1 (3.6%), and type 1C in 3 (10.7%) patients. The age distribution of asystolic syncope was bimodal, with a peak at age < 19 years and a second peak at the age of 60-79 years. At Cox multivariable analysis, syncope without prodromes (OR 3.7; p = 0.0008) and use of beta blockers (OR 3.2; p = 0.002) were independently associated to ILR-detected asystole.

Conclusions: In patients with unexplained syncope and negative HUTT, the age distribution of asystolic syncope detected by ILR is bimodal, suggesting a different mechanism responsible for asystole in both younger and older patients. The absence of prodromes and the use of beta blockers are independent predictors of ILR-detected asystole.

Keywords: Age; Asystole; Gender; Predictors; Syncope; Vasovagal syncope.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors did not report conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Age distribution (per decades) of ILR detected asystole during lifespan
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Time from ILR implantation to asystole detection

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sutton R, Fedorowski A, Olshansky B, et al. Tilt testing remains a valuable asset. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(17):1654–1660. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab084. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Russo V, Parente E, Comune A, et al. The clinical presentation of syncope influences the head-up tilt test responses. Eur J Intern Med. 2023;110:41–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2023.01.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brignole M, Moya A, de Lange FJ, ESC Scientific Document Group et al. 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(21):1883–1948. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy037. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Solbiati M, Casazza G, Dipaola F, et al. The diagnostic yield of implantable loop recorders in unexplained syncope: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2017;15(231):170–176. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.12.128. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moya A, Brignole M, Menozzi C, et al. International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology (ISSUE) Investigators Mechanism of syncope in patients with isolated syncope and in patients with tilt-positive syncope. Circulation. 2001;104(11):1261–1267. doi: 10.1161/hc3601.095708. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types