Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb;47(2):e24229.
doi: 10.1002/clc.24229.

Prognostic significance of IL-18 in acute coronary syndrome patients

Affiliations

Prognostic significance of IL-18 in acute coronary syndrome patients

Chenchun Xiong et al. Clin Cardiol. 2024 Feb.

Abstract

Background: After acute coronary syndrome (ACS), inflammation aids healing but may harm the heart. Interleukin (IL)-18 and IL-1β are pivotal proinflammatory cytokines released during pyroptosis, a process that initiates and sustains inflammation. This study aimed to evaluate the levels of circulating IL-18 and IL-1β during the progression of ACS and to determine their association with subsequent clinical events in ACS patients.

Hypothesis: Circulating levels of IL-18 and IL-1β are associated with subsequent clinical events in ACS patients.

Methods: Employing immunoassays, we examined plasma levels of IL-1β and IL-18 in 159 ACS patients and matched them with 159 healthy controls. The primary composite endpoint included recurrent unstable angina, myocardial infarction, heart failure exacerbation, stroke, or cardiovascular death.

Results: ACS patients exhibited a significant increase in plasma IL-18 levels, measuring 6.36 [4.46-9.88] × 102 pg/mL, in contrast to the control group with levels at 4.04 [3.21-4.94] × 102 pg/mL (p < 0.001). Conversely, plasma levels of IL-1β remained unchanged compared to the control group. Following a 25-month follow-up, IL-18 levels exceeding the median remained an important prognostic factor for adverse clinical events in ACS patients (hazard ratio = 2.37, 95% confidence interval: 1.14-4.91, p = 0.021). Besides, IL-18 displayed a nonlinear association with adverse clinical events (p nonlinear = 0.044). Subgroup analysis revealed that the correlation between IL-18 and the risk of adverse clinical events was not significantly affected by factors such as age, sex, history of diabetes, smoking, Gensini score, or ACS type (all p interaction >0.05).

Conclusion: IL-18 appears to hold potential as a predictive marker for anticipating clinical outcomes in patients with ACS.

Keywords: acute coronary syndrome; adverse clinical events; inflammation; interleukin-18; interleukin-1β; prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan−Meier curves depict adverse clinical events in relation to IL‐18 levels within ACS. The curves represent the occurrence of adverse clinical events over a 25‐month follow‐up, categorized by high and low IL‐18 levels. ACS, acute coronary syndrome.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Multivariable adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for adverse clinical events according to levels of IL‐18 on a continuous scale. Solid purple lines are multivariable adjusted HR, with dashed purple lines showing 95% confidence intervals derived from restricted cubic spline regressions with four knots. The median of IL‐18 6.36 × 102 pg/mL was selected as the reference level. Yellow histograms show the fraction of the population with different levels of IL‐18(102 pg/mL). Adjusted for age, gender, diabetes, hypertension, LVEF, NTproBNP, hsCTnT, LVPW, Gensini scores, and CRP. CRP, C‐reactive protein; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVPW, left ventricular posterior wall.
Figure 3
Figure 3
IL‐18 as a predictor of adverse clinical events occurrence in different subgroups. The HR (hazard ratio) values for each subgroup were adjusted for age, gender, hypertension, diabetes, and LVEF. *Statistically significant. AMI, acute myocardial infarction; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; UA, unstable angina.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vergallo R, Crea F. Atherosclerotic plaque disruption and healing. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(42):4079‐4080. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa831 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics‐2023 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023;147(8):e93‐e621. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001123 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ridker PM, Bhatt DL, Pradhan AD, Glynn RJ, MacFadyen JG, Nissen SE. Inflammation and cholesterol as predictors of cardiovascular events among patients receiving statin therapy: a collaborative analysis of three randomised trials. Lancet. 2023;401(10384):1293‐1301. 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00215-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ridker PM. The time to initiate anti‐inflammatory therapy for patients with chronic coronary atherosclerosis has arrived. Circulation. 2023;148(14):1071‐1073. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gomez‐Delgado F, Raya‐Cruz M, Katsiki N, Delgado‐Lista J, Perez‐Martinez P. Residual cardiovascular risk: when should we treat it? Eur J Intern Med. 2023;S0953–6205(23):00368. 10.1016/j.ejim.2023.10.013 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources