Biomarkers of systemic inflammation provide additional prognostic stratification in cancers of unknown primary
- PMID: 38404120
- PMCID: PMC10895198
- DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6988
Biomarkers of systemic inflammation provide additional prognostic stratification in cancers of unknown primary
Abstract
Background: Biomarkers of systemic inflammation have been shown to predict outcomes in patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP). We sought to validate these findings in patients with confirmed CUP (cCUP) and explore their role alongside existing clinicopathological prognostic categories.
Patients and methods: CUP oncologist from across the United Kingdom were invited to include patients with cCUP referred to their local CUP multidisciplinary team. Patient demographics, clinical, pathological and outcome data were recorded and analysed.
Results: Data were available for 548 patients from four CUP services. 23% (n = 124) of patients met clinicopathological criteria for favourable-risk cCUP. On multivariate analysis c-reactive protein (CRP) (p < 0.001) and the Scottish Inflammatory Prognostic Score (SIPS: combining albumin and neutrophil count) (p < 0.001) were independently predictive of survival. CRP and SIPS effectively stratified survival in patients with both favourable-risk and poor-risk cCUP based on clinicopathological features.
Conclusions: Biomarkers of systemic inflammation are reliable prognostic factors in patients with cCUP, regardless of clinicopathological subgroup. We recommend that CRP or SIPS are incorporated into routine clinical assessments of patients with cCUP as a tool to aid investigation and/or treatment decision-making across all groups. Established clinicopathological factors can then be used to inform management pathways and specific systemic anticancer therapy selection.
Keywords: Scottish inflammatory prognostic score; c-reactive protein; cancer of unknown primary; prognosis; systemic anticancer therapy.
© 2024 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
NC—outside the scope of the work presented, research funding/educational research grants have been received by the Experimental Cancer Medicine Team (PI: Cook) from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Pfizer, Orion, Taiho Oncology, Roche, Starpharma, Eisai, RedX, UCB, Boeringher, Merck, Stemline Tarveda and Avacta. The remaining authors have no conflicts to declare.
Figures
References
-
- NICE clinical guideline . National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. 2010. Metastatic malignant disease of unknown primary origin [Internet]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/ search?q = Metastatic+malignant+disease+of+unknown+primary+origin
-
- Fizazi K, Greco FA, Pavlidis N, et al. Cancers of unknown primary site: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow‐up. Ann Oncol off J Eur Soc Med Oncol. 2015. Sep;26(Suppl 5):v133‐v138. - PubMed
-
- CRUK . Cancer Research UK Cancer of Unknown Primary Statistics [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health‐professional/cancer‐statistics/s...
-
- Krämer A, Bochtler T, Pauli C, et al. Cancer of unknown primary: ESMO clinical practice guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow‐up. Ann Oncol off J Eur Soc. Med. Oncol. 2023;34(3):228‐246. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Miscellaneous