Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2024 Feb 9:15:1341313.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1341313. eCollection 2024.

Neutralizing antibody levels detected early after mRNA-based vaccination do not predict by themselves subsequent breakthrough infections of SARS-CoV-2

Affiliations
Comment

Neutralizing antibody levels detected early after mRNA-based vaccination do not predict by themselves subsequent breakthrough infections of SARS-CoV-2

Roberto Alonso et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

The development of mRNA vaccines represented a significant achievement in response to the global health crisis during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Evaluating vaccine efficacy entails identifying different anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, such as total antibodies against the Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) of the S-protein, or neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). This study utilized an innovative PETIA-based kit to measure NAb, and the investigation aimed to assess whether levels of anti-RBD IgG and NAb uniformly measured 30 days after vaccination could predict individuals at a higher risk of subsequent infection in the months following vaccination. Among a cohort of healthy vaccinated healthcare workers larger than 6,000, 12 mRNA-1273- and 115 BNT162b2-vaccinated individuals contracted infections after the first two doses. The main finding is that neither anti-RBD IgG nor NAb levels measured at day 30 post-vaccination can be used as predictors of breakthrough infections (BI). Therefore, the levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies detected shortly after vaccination are not the pivotal factors involved in antiviral protection, and other characteristics must be considered in understanding protection against infection. Furthermore, the levels of anti-RBD and NAbs followed a very similar pattern, with a correlation coefficient of r = 0.96. This robust correlation would justify ceasing the quantification of NAbs, as the information provided by both determinations is highly similar. This optimization would help allocate resources more efficiently and speed up the determination of individuals' humoral immunity status.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; anti-RBD IgG; breakthrough infection; humoral immunity; neutralizing antibodies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Anti-RBD IgG and NAb quantified in serum samples 30 days post-vaccination. Violin plots representing (A) anti-RBD IgG BAU/ml and (B) NAb AU/ml per group, split per vaccine type and infection status: mRNA-1273-CT (light green), mRNA-1273-BI (dark green), BNT162b2-CT (light blue) and BNT162b2-BI (dark blue). The thick dotted line within the violin plot indicates the median and the thin dotted line indicates the quartiles (25 and 75%). For the anti-RBD IgG, the dotted line at 5,680 BAU/ml indicates the upper limit of quantification (ULOQ). For statistical analysis, Kruskal-Wallis test was performed. *p value < 0.05. **p value < 0.01.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Correlations between anti-RBD IgG and NAb levels. (A) Correlation between both types of antibodies attending to the two types of vaccines or (B) independently of the vaccine type. Each point corresponds to a single determination, and the bold line indicates the linear regression. The r is the Spearman Correlation Coefficient (SCC). Statistical differences were considered when p value < 0.05.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Correlations between NAb levels and time elapsed between NAb quantification and infection. (A) Correlation attending to the two types of vaccines or (B) independently of the vaccine type. Each point corresponds to a single determination, and the bold line indicates the linear regression. NAb is indicated in AU/ml, and time elapsed between NAb quantification and infection is indicated in days. (C) NAb levels divided into different cohorts taking into account time from vaccination to infection. Statistical differences were considered when p value < 0.05.

Comment on

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, Absalon J, Gurtman A, Lockhart S, et al. . Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine. N Engl J Med (2020) 383(27):2603–15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2034577 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baden LR, El Sahly HM, Essink B, Kotloff K, Frey S, Novak R, et al. . Efficacy and safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. N Engl J Med (2021) 384(5):403–16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2035389 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lin DY, Xu Y, Gu Y, Zeng D, Wheeler B, Young H, et al. . Effectiveness of bivalent boosters against severe omicron infection. N Engl J Med (2023) 388(8):764–6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2215471 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gupta RK, Topol EJ. COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough infections. Science (2021) 374(6575):1561–2. doi: 10.1126/science.abl8487 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen Y, Zhao X, Zhou H, Zhu H, Jiang S, Wang P. Broadly neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and other human coronaviruses. Nat Rev Immunol (2023) 23(3):189–99. doi: 10.1038/s41577-022-00784-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types