Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 17;10(4):e26660.
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26660. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.

Unilateral external fixator and its biomechanical effects in treating different types of femoral fracture: A finite element study with experimental validated model

Aishah Umairah Abd Aziz  1   2 , Muhammad Imam Ammarullah  3   4   5 , Bing Wui Ng  6 , Hong-Seng Gan  7 , Mohammed Rafiq Abdul Kadir  8 , Muhammad Hanif Ramlee  1   2
Affiliations

Unilateral external fixator and its biomechanical effects in treating different types of femoral fracture: A finite element study with experimental validated model

Aishah Umairah Abd Aziz et al. Heliyon. .

Abstract

Previous works had successfully demonstrated the clinical effectiveness of unilateral external fixator in treating various types of fracture, ranging from the simple type, such as oblique and transverse fractures, to complex fractures. However, literature that investigated its biomechanical analyses to further justify its efficacy is limited. Therefore, this paper aimed to analyse the stability of unilateral external fixator for treating different types of fracture, including the simple oblique, AO32C3 comminuted, and 20 mm gap transverse fracture. These fractures were reconstructed at the distal diaphysis of the femoral bone and computationally analysed through the finite element method under the stance phase condition. Findings showed a decrease in the fixation stiffness in large gap fracture (645.2 Nmm-1 for oblique and comminuted, while 23.4 Nmm-1 for the gap fracture), which resulted in higher displacement, IFM and stress distribution at the pin bone interface. These unfavourable conditions could consequently increase the risk of delayed union, pin loosening and infection, as well as implant failure. Nevertheless, the stress observed on the fracture surfaces was relatively low and in controlled amount, indicating that bone unity is still allowable in all models. Briefly, the unilateral fixation may provide desirable results in smaller fracture gap, but its usage in larger gap fracture might be alarming. These findings could serve as a guide and insight for surgeons and researchers, especially on the biomechanical stability of fixation in different fracture types and how will it affect bone unity.

Keywords: External fixator; Femur; Finite element analysis; Fracture healing; Pin tract infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
3D model of a (a) healthy bone, (b) Unilateral external fixator, and fitted bone-fixator construct for (c) oblique fracture, (d) 20 mm gap transverse fracture, and (e) complex AO32C3 comminuted fracture, along with the boundary conditions applied.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Validation test where the (a) femoral bone was compressed under axial compression, mimicking the (b) 3D FE femoral bone model, and the (c) graphical presentation of the results describing the correlation of the two tests.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Stiffness calculated for the three different fracture type.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Displacement and IFM for (a) oblique, (b) comminuted, and (c) gap fracture, as well as the deformation for (d) oblique, (e) comminuted, and (f) gap fracture.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Stress contour and histogram of VMS distribution specifically on the fracture gap between the three types of fracture for (a) Oblique, (b) Comminuted, and (c) 20 mm gap transverse.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Stress contour between the three types of fracture.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Suaimi M.K.A., Ab Rashid A.M., Nasution A.K., Hong Seng G., Abdul Kadir M.R., Ramlee M.H. Biomechanical evaluation of locking compression plate (LCP) versus Dynamic compression plate (DCP): a finite element analysis. J. Teknol. 2022;84:125–131. doi: 10.11113/jurnalteknologi.v84.16687. - DOI
    1. Ramlee M.H., Seng G.H., Ros Felip A., Abdul Kadir M.R. The effects of additional hollow cylinder coated to external fixator screws for treating pilon fracture: a biomechanical perspective. Injury. 2021;52:2131–2141. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.03.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu K.-Y., Wu K.-W., Lee C.-C., Lin S.-C., Kuo K.N., Wang T.-M. Tibial Lengthening along submuscular plate with simultaneous acute tibial deformity correction by high-energy osteotomy: a comparative study. J. Clin. Med. 2022;11:5478. doi: 10.3390/jcm11185478. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schmitt D., Halvachizadeh S., Steinemann R., Jensen K.O., Berk T., Neuhaus V., Mica L., Pfeifer R., Pape H.C., Sprengel K. Trauma team activation: which surgical capability is immediately required in polytrauma? A retrospective, monocentric analysis of emergency procedures performed on 751 severely injured patients. J. Clin. Med. 2021;10:4335. doi: 10.3390/jcm10194335. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Manon J., Pletser V., Saint-Guillain M., Vanderdonckt J., Wain C., Jacobs J., Comein A., Drouet S., Meert J., Sanchez Casla I.J., Cartiaux O., Cornu O. An easy-to-use external fixator for all hostile environments, from space to war medicine: is it meant for everyone's hands? J. Clin. Med. 2023;12:4764. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144764. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources