Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 25;16(1):e52934.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.52934. eCollection 2024 Jan.

Evaluation of an Intravenous Acetaminophen Protocol in the Emergency Department

Affiliations

Evaluation of an Intravenous Acetaminophen Protocol in the Emergency Department

Aaron B Deutsch et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Background: Acute pain is a leading reason for Emergency Department (ED) evaluation, accounting for nearly half of all ED visits. Therefore, providing effective non-opioid analgesics in the ED is critical. Oral acetaminophen (APAP) is commonly administered in the ED but is limited to patients tolerating oral intake. Intravenous (IV) APAP provides significant pain reduction parenterally. The purpose of this quality assessment project was to evaluate the frequency of opioid use in patients receiving IV APAP, the safety of IV APAP, and compliance with an ED IV APAP protocol.

Methods: This study included all patients who received IV APAP in the ED of a tertiary care, level I trauma center, during a three-month period. The protocol required ED patients to be NPO (nil per os), 18 years or older, and administered with a single 1000 mg dose. The adverse reactions within 24 hours post-IV APAP, ED length of stay (LOS), and opioid administration within four hours post-IV APAP were assessed.

Results: Ninety-four patients received IV APAP. All patients received a 1000 mg dose. One patient received more than one dose, but this patient had a 22-hour ED LOS. Two patients received oral medications within one hour of IV APAP (one received an antacid, and the other received carbamazepine and lamotrigine). An opioid was administered to 22 of the 94 (23.4%) patients during the four-hour protocol period. There were no reports of adverse reactions.

Conclusions: The results show excellent compliance with the protocol. IV APAP was safe and well-tolerated. Notably, most patients did not receive an opioid within four hours of IV APAP. IV APAP can be safely and effectively utilized as an analgesic and lessen ED opioid use.

Keywords: emergency department analgesia; intravenous acetaminophen; opioid epidemic; parenteral analgesia; patient safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Similar articles

References

    1. Trends in opioid prescribing by race/ethnicity for patients seeking care in US emergency departments. Pletcher MJ, Kertesz SG, Kohn MA, Gonzales R. JAMA. 2008;299:70–78. - PubMed
    1. Emergency department visit rates by selected characteristics: United States, 2020. Cairns C, Ashman JJ, King JM. NCHS Data Brief. 2022;452:1–8. - PubMed
    1. Pathophysiological aspects of nephropathy caused by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Lucas GN, Leitão AC, Alencar RL, Xavier RM, Daher EF, Silva Junior GB. J Bras Nefrol. 2019;41:124–130. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Medication use and pain management in pregnancy: a critical review. Black E, Khor KE, Kennedy D, Chutatape A, Sharma S, Vancaillie T, Demirkol A. Pain Pract. 2019;19:875–899. - PubMed
    1. Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. Lee NM, Saha S. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2011;40:309-34, vii. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources