The crosstalk between photoperiod and early mild stress on juvenile oscar (Astronotus ocellatus) after acute stress
- PMID: 38407735
- DOI: 10.1007/s10695-024-01316-7
The crosstalk between photoperiod and early mild stress on juvenile oscar (Astronotus ocellatus) after acute stress
Abstract
Early mild stress (EMS) is like preparedness and might help fish deal with stress appropriately. This study investigated how EMS and photoperiod changes can impact growth, haematology, blood biochemistry, immunological response, antioxidant system, liver enzymes, and stress response of oscar (Astronotus ocellatus; 7.29 ± 0.96 g) before and after acute confinement stress (AC stress). Ten experimental treatments included five different photoperiods 8L16D (08:16 light to dark), 12L12D (12:12 light to dark), 16L8D (16:08 light to dark), 20L4D (20:04 light to dark), and 24L0D (24:00 light to dark), and these five photoperiod schedules were conducted in an EMS condition. After 9 weeks, no significant differences were found in growth parameters, survival rate, and body composition. At the end of the experiment and after AC stress, fish farmed in 24 light hours had the lowest haematocrit, white blood cells, total protein, blood performance, lysozyme, immunoglobulin M, complement C3, superoxide dismutase, and catalase. Fish that experienced EMS had significantly higher survival rates than those farmed in normal conditions (80.67% vs 61.33%). In conclusion, considering all measured parameters, 8-h light can be suggested as an optimum photoperiod for this fish species. Under 24L0D (no EMS) conditions, there were many negative effects apparent. In addition, a positive effect of EMS was evident in terms of survival after AC stress. AC stress decreased some health parameters under 24-h light treatment, while these results were not observed in EMS-exposed fish. Therefore, the EMS schedule can be a useful tool in preventing the negative effects of stress.
Keywords: Antioxidant response; Blood biochemistry; Blood performance; Continuous light; Stress physiology.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
References
-
- Abdollahpour H, Falahatkar B, Lawrence C (2020) The effect of photoperiod on growth and spawning performance of zebrafish, Danio Rerio. Aquac Rep 17:100295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2020.100295 - DOI
-
- Adam ML, Torres MFP, Franci AC, Sponchiado G, Torres RA, Correia MTDS (2011) On the stress by photoperiod, temperature and noise as possible causes of genomic damaging in an animal model. Stress Health 27:e152–e156. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.1350 - DOI
-
- Ahmadi-Noorbakhsh S, Mirabzadeh Ardakani E, Sadighi J, Aldavood SJ, Farajli Abbasi M, Farzad-Mohajeri S, Ghasemi A, Sharif-Paghaleh E, Hatami Z, Nikravanfard N (2021) Guideline for the care and use of laboratory animals in Iran. Lab Anim 50:303–305. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41684-021-00871-3 - DOI
-
- Akhtar M, Rajesh M, Kamalam B, Ciji A (2020) Effect of photoperiod and temperature on indicators of immunity and wellbeing of endangered golden mahseer (Tor putitora) broodstock. J Therm Biol 93:102694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2020.102694 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Almazán-Rueda P, Van Helmond AM, Verreth J, Schrama J (2005) Photoperiod affects growth, behaviour and stress variables in Clarias gariepinus. J Fish Biol 67:1029–1039. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-1112.2005.00806.x - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
