Theory of radiologist interaction with instant messaging decision support tools: A sequential-explanatory study
- PMID: 38408043
- PMCID: PMC10896537
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000297
Theory of radiologist interaction with instant messaging decision support tools: A sequential-explanatory study
Abstract
Radiology specific clinical decision support systems (CDSS) and artificial intelligence are poorly integrated into the radiologist workflow. Current research and development efforts of radiology CDSS focus on 4 main interventions, based around exam centric time points-after image acquisition, intra-report support, post-report analysis, and radiology workflow adjacent. We review the literature surrounding CDSS tools in these time points, requirements for CDSS workflow augmentation, and technologies that support clinician to computer workflow augmentation. We develop a theory of radiologist-decision tool interaction using a sequential explanatory study design. The study consists of 2 phases, the first a quantitative survey and the second a qualitative interview study. The phase 1 survey identifies differences between average users and radiologist users in software interventions using the User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View (UTAUT) framework. Phase 2 semi-structured interviews provide narratives on why these differences are found. To build this theory, we propose a novel solution called Radibot-a conversational agent capable of engaging clinicians with CDSS as an assistant using existing instant messaging systems supporting hospital communications. This work contributes an understanding of how radiologist-users differ from the average user and can be utilized by software developers to increase satisfaction of CDSS tools within radiology.
Copyright: © 2024 Burns et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Acceptance, Barriers, and Facilitators to Implementing Artificial Intelligence-Based Decision Support Systems in Emergency Departments: Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation.JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jun 13;6(6):e36501. doi: 10.2196/36501. JMIR Form Res. 2022. PMID: 35699995 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of user interface and workflow design of a bedside nursing clinical decision support system.Interact J Med Res. 2013 Jan 31;2(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.2402. Interact J Med Res. 2013. PMID: 23612350 Free PMC article.
-
A Clinical Decision Support System for Sleep Staging Tasks With Explanations From Artificial Intelligence: User-Centered Design and Evaluation Study.J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 19;24(1):e28659. doi: 10.2196/28659. J Med Internet Res. 2022. PMID: 35044311 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the alert appropriateness of clinical decision support systems in supporting clinical workflow.J Biomed Inform. 2020 Jun;106:103453. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103453. Epub 2020 May 14. J Biomed Inform. 2020. PMID: 32417444 Review.
-
Reasons For Physicians Not Adopting Clinical Decision Support Systems: Critical Analysis.JMIR Med Inform. 2018 Apr 18;6(2):e24. doi: 10.2196/medinform.8912. JMIR Med Inform. 2018. PMID: 29669706 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Gichoya JW, Alarifi M, Bhaduri R, Tahir B, Purkayastha S, editors. Using cognitive fit theory to evaluate patient understanding of medical images. 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC); 2017 11–15 July 2017. - PubMed
-
- Gichoya JW, Nuthakki S, Maity PG, Purkayastha S. Phronesis of AI in radiology: Superhuman meets natural stupidity. arXiv preprint arXiv:180311244. 2018.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources