Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 26;24(1):243.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10536-1.

Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of digital technologies in mental health systems: a qualitative systematic review to inform a policy framework

Affiliations

Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of digital technologies in mental health systems: a qualitative systematic review to inform a policy framework

Chiara Berardi et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Despite the potential for improved population mental health and wellbeing, the integration of mental health digital interventions has been difficult to achieve. In this qualitative systematic review, we aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of digital technologies in mental healthcare systems, and map these to an implementation framework to inform policy development.

Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, Scopus, PsycInfo, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for primary research articles published between January 2010 and 2022. Studies were considered eligible if they reported barriers and/or facilitators to the integration of any digital mental healthcare technologies. Data were extracted using EPPI-Reviewer Web and analysed thematically via inductive and deductive cycles.

Results: Of 12,525 references identified initially, 81 studies were included in the final analysis. Barriers and facilitators were grouped within an implementation (evidence-practice gap) framework across six domains, organised by four levels of mental healthcare systems. Broadly, implementation was hindered by the perception of digital technologies as impersonal tools that add additional burden of care onto both providers and patients, and change relational power asymmetries; an absence of resources; and regulatory complexities that impede access to universal coverage. Facilitators included person-cantered approaches that consider patients' intersectional features e.g., gender, class, disability, illness severity; evidence-based training for providers; collaboration among colleagues; appropriate investment in human and financial resources; and policy reforms that tackle universal access to digital health.

Conclusion: It is important to consider the complex and interrelated nature of barriers across different domains and levels of the mental health system. To facilitate the equitable, sustainable, and long-term digital transition of mental health systems, policymakers should consider a systemic approach to collaboration between public and private sectors to inform evidence-based planning and strengthen mental health systems.

Protocol registration: The protocol is registered on PROSPERO, CRD42021276838.

Keywords: Digital health technologies; Health reform; Health systems; Mental health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram of included studies [24]
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Systemic representation of barriers and facilitators to the implementation of digital health technologies across levels of mental health systems according to Furst [22]
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Organisation of barriers and facilitators into implementation domains according to Cochrane [21]

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kakuma R, Minas H, van Ginneken N, Dal Poz MR, Desiraju K, Morris JE, et al. Human resources for mental health care: current situation and strategies for action. Lancet. 2011;378(9803):1654–63. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61093-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rehm J, Shield KD. Global burden of Disease and the impact of mental and addictive disorders. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019;21(2):1–7. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-0997-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Henderson C, Evans-Lacko S, Thornicroft G. Mental Illness stigma, help seeking, and public health programs. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(5):777–80. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301056. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Santomauro DF, Herrera AMM, Shadid J, Zheng P, Ashbaugh C, Pigott DM et al. Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet. 2021. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Romanello M, McGushin A, Di Napoli C, Drummond P, Hughes N, Jamart L, et al. The 2021 report of the Lancet countdown on health and climate change: code red for a healthy future. The Lancet. 2021;398(10311):1619–62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01787-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources