Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May;271(5):2787-2797.
doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12188-5. Epub 2024 Feb 27.

5qSMA: standardised retrospective natural history assessment in 268 patients with four copies of SMN2

Katharina Vill  1   2 Moritz Tacke  3 Anna König  3 Matthias Baumann  4 Manuela Baumgartner  5 Meike Steinbach  6 Guenther Bernert  7 Astrid Blaschek  3 Marcus Deschauer  8 Marina Flotats-Bastardas  9 Johannes Friese  10 Susanne Goldbach  11 Martin Gross  12 René Günther  13 Andreas Hahn  14 Tim Hagenacker  15 Erwin Hauser  16 Veronka Horber  17 Sabine Illsinger  18 Jessika Johannsen  19 Christoph Kamm  20 Jan C Koch  21 Heike Koelbel  22 Cornelia Koehler  23 Kirsten Kolzter  24 Hanns Lochmüller  25   26 Albert Ludolph  27   28 Alexander Mensch  29 Gerd Meyer Zu Hoerste  30 Monika Mueller  31 Wolfgang Mueller-Felber  3 Christoph Neuwirth  32 Susanne Petri  33 Kristina Probst-Schendzielorz  34 Manuel Pühringer  35 Robert Steinbach  36 Ulrike Schara-Schmidt  22 Mareike Schimmel  37 Bertold Schrank  38 Oliver Schwartz  39 Kurt Schlachter  40 Annette Schwerin-Nagel  41 Gudrun Schreiber  42 Martin Smitka  43 Raffi Topakian  44 Regina Trollmann  45 Matthias Tuerk  46   47 Manuela Theophil  48 Christian Rauscher  49 Mathias Vorgerd  50 Maggie C Walter  51 Markus Weiler  52 Claudia Weiss  53 Ekkehard Wilichowski  54 Claudia D Wurster  28 Gilbert Wunderlich  55   56 Daniel Zeller  57 Andreas Ziegler  58 Janbernd Kirschner #  23 Astrid Pechmann #  23 SMArtCARE study group
Affiliations

5qSMA: standardised retrospective natural history assessment in 268 patients with four copies of SMN2

Katharina Vill et al. J Neurol. 2024 May.

Abstract

Newborn screening for 5qSMA offers the potential for early, ideally pre-symptomatic, therapeutic intervention. However, limited data exist on the outcomes of individuals with 4 copies of SMN2, and there is no consensus within the SMA treatment community regarding early treatment initiation in this subgroup. To provide evidence-based insights into disease progression, we performed a retrospective analysis of 268 patients with 4 copies of SMN2 from the SMArtCARE registry in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Inclusion criteria required comprehensive baseline data and diagnosis outside of newborn screening. Only data prior to initiation of disease-modifying treatment were included. The median age at disease onset was 3.0 years, with a mean of 6.4 years. Significantly, 55% of patients experienced symptoms before the age of 36 months. 3% never learned to sit unaided, a further 13% never gained the ability to walk independently and 33% of ambulatory patients lost this ability during the course of the disease. 43% developed scoliosis, 6.3% required non-invasive ventilation and 1.1% required tube feeding. In conclusion, our study, in line with previous observations, highlights the substantial phenotypic heterogeneity in SMA. Importantly, this study provides novel insights: the median age of disease onset in patients with 4 SMN2 copies typically occurs before school age, and in half of the patients even before the age of three years. These findings support a proactive approach, particularly early treatment initiation, in this subset of SMA patients diagnosed pre-symptomatically. However, it is important to recognize that the register will not include asymptomatic individuals.

Keywords: SMN2; Age of onset; Molecular therapies; Neonatal screening; Pre-symptomatic treatment; SMA; Spinal muscular atrophy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

AB has received travel expenses and speaker fees from Roche, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, Biogen and Santhera. AH has received speaker fees and honoraria for advisor activities from Biogen, Roche, and Novartis Gene Therapies, and research grants from Novartis Gene Therapies. AL is a member of Advisory Boards of Roche Pharma AG, Biogen, Alector and Amylyx. He received compensation for talks from Biologix, the German Society of Neurology, Biogen, Springer Medicine, Amylyx and the company Streamed Up! GmbH. He is involved in trials which are sponsored by Amylyx, Ferrer International, Novartis Research and Development, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Alexion, Orion Pharma, the European Union, BMBF, Biogen and Orphazyme, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, QurAlis and Alector. AM has received advisory board honoraria from Hormosan and Sanofi, outside of the submitted work. AP received compensation for advisory boards, training activities and research grants from Novartis and Biogen. AR received honoraria as speaker from Amylyx Pharmaceuticals and as consultant in advisory boards from Biogen and Argenx. RS received honoraria as speaker from ITF Pharma. AZ received compensation for advisory boards and speaker fees from Biogen, Novartis and Roche. He received research compensation from Biogen. CDW has received honoraria from Biogen as an advisory board member and for lectures and as a consultant and advisory board member from Hoffmann‑La Roche. She also received travel expenses from Biogen. CK has received compensation for advisory boards and speaker honoraria from Biogen, Roche and Ipsen, and unrestricted travel grants from Merz and Ipsen, outside of the submitted work. CN has received personal fees from Biogen and Hoffmann–La Roche outside of the submitted work for advisory boards. CW has received honoraria for advisory boards and presentations and travel expenses from Biogen, Avexis/Novartis and Roche. DZ received compensation from Biogen for participation on advisory boards, from Novartis for consultancy work, and travel compensation from Angelini Pharma outside of the submitted work. GMzH received compensation for serving on scientific advisory boards (Alexion, Roche, LFB, Immunovant) and speaker honoraria (Alexion, LFB). He has received scientific project funding from Biogen and Merck. GW has received advisory board honoraria and speaker fees from Alnylam, Biogen, Hormosan, Pfizer and Sobi outside of the submitted work. HK is serving on a scientific advisory board for Avexis and received travel expenses and speaker honoraria from Biogen, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi-Aventis. JJ received compensation for advisory boards and funding for travel or speaker honoraria from Avexis/Novartis, Biogen, ITF, Roche, PTC, Pfizer and Sarepta Therapeutics. JK received compensation for research and/or educational and consultancy activities from Biogen, Avexis/Novartis, Roche and Scholar Rock. KV has received received honoraria as an advisory board member, travel expenses and speaker fees from Biogen, Santhera, Orchard, ITF and Novartis. MB received compensation for advisory boards and speakers honoraria from Novartis, Biogen and Roche. MCW received speaker fees and compensation for advisory boards and consultancy activities from Biogen, Avexis/Novartis, Roche. MD has received personal fees as speaker/consultant from Biogen and Roche. MFB has received consultant fees from Biogen, Novartis and Hoffmann-La Roche and Biogen. MG has received an advisory board honorarium from Hoffmann-La Roche and a speaker fee from Novartis outside of the submitted work. MS received compensation for advisory boards from Roche, Eisai and Takeda. MW received advisory board and consultant honoraria from Biogen and Hoffmann-La Roche, and speaker honoraria and travel support for conference attendance from Biogen, outside of the submitted work. OS has served as a member of a scientific advisory board for Avexis and received travel expenses and speaker fees from Biogen. RT received speaker fees and compensation for advisory boards from Biogen, Roche, and PTC. SI received compensation for advisory board and speakers honoraria from Novartis and Roche. SG received consulting fees and speaker fees from Novartis. SP has received speaker fees, non-financial support and research support from Biogen, Roche, AL-S Pharma, Amylyx, Cytokinetics, Ferrer, ITF-Pharma, Zambon, PTC and Sanofi and served on advisory boards of Amylyx, Biogen, Roche, Zambon and ITF Pharma and research grants from the German Neuromuscular Society (DGM) and Neurodegenerative Research outside of the submitted work. TH received compensation for advisory boards, speaker fees and research grants from Roche, Novartis and Biogen. US has served as a member of a scientific advisory board and data safety monitoring board for Biogen, Avexis and Novartis and received speaker fees from Biogen, Avexis, PTC and Sanofi-Aventis. VH received compensation for advisory boards from Avexis/Novartis and Biogen. WMF has served as a member of a scientific advisory board for Biogen, Avexis, PTC, Sarepta, Sanofi-Aventis, Roche and Cytokinetics and received travel expenses and speaker fees from Biogen, Avexis, Novartis, PTC, Roche, Sarepta and Sanofi-Aventis.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Kaplan–Meier curve for age at disease onset: by the age of 18 years, approximately 95% of patients with four copies of SMN2 was affected by the disease
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A Kaplan–Meier curve for loss of walking ability. By the age of 54, 32.5% of our cohort had lost their ability to walk without assistance. Note: For 20% of patients in this study cohort who lost independent ambulation, the exact age is unknown. Accordingly, 20% of the patients who were still able to walk were subtracted to create this curve. B Ambulation as a function of age for the entire cohort. Missing values were estimated from all known values
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Results of the motor function tests in Baseline. The wide variability of the disease independent of age is evident, with patients ranging from severely to mildly affected in all age groups up to 69 years. It can be assumed for both HFSME and RULM, that full scores are expected from the age of six onwards. Reference values for the 6MWT are shaded in a grey area on the chart

References

    1. Burghes AH, Beattie CE. Spinal muscular atrophy: why do low levels of survival motor neuron protein make motor neurons sick? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10(8):597–609. doi: 10.1038/nrn2670. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pellizzoni L, Yong J, Dreyfuss G. Essential role for the SMN complex in the specificity of snRNP assembly. Science. 2002;298(5599):1775–1779. doi: 10.1126/science.1074962. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Verhaart IEC, et al. Prevalence, incidence and carrier frequency of 5q-linked spinal muscular atrophy - a literature review. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017;12(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s13023-017-0671-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lefebvre S, et al. Identification and characterization of a spinal muscular atrophy-determining gene. Cell. 1995;80(1):155–165. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90460-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lorson CL, et al. A single nucleotide in the SMN gene regulates splicing and is responsible for spinal muscular atrophy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(11):6307–6311. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.11.6307. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances