Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr;34(3):1683-1690.
doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03815-4. Epub 2024 Feb 27.

Acute versus staged fixation of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures: a dual centre international study

Lazaro Mesa  1 , Reuben C Lufrano  2 , Mir Ibrahim Sajid  2 , Christopher Flanagan  1   2 , Ishvinder S Grewal  2 , Peter Bates  3 , Hassan R Mir  4   5 ; Tibial Plateau Study Group
Collaborators, Affiliations

Acute versus staged fixation of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures: a dual centre international study

Lazaro Mesa et al. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Bicondylar tibial plateau fractures pose many treatment challenges due to their complex fracture patterns and associated soft tissue compromise. We aim to evaluate outcomes of acute ORIF (aORIF) versus staged ORIF (sORIF) of high energy bicondylar tibial plateau fractures.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 186 patients at two high-volume Level I trauma centers. One hundred one patients underwent aORIF and 85 underwent sORIF between 2011 and 2019. Clinical outcomes of interest included operative time, wound dehiscence, superficial and deep infection, nonunion, flap coverage, arthrodesis, and early conversion to arthroplasty.

Results: Patients had a median follow up of 12 months (6-98 months). The sORIF group had a higher ISS (p = 0.02) and a higher rate of open fractures (24.7% vs 11.9%, p = 0.03). The groups were statistically similar in other demographics and co-morbidities. Operative time was significantly shorter in the aORIF group (157 vs 213 min., p < 0.001). There was no statistical difference in wound dehiscence, deep infection, flap coverage, nonunion, unplanned reoperation, or post-traumatic arthritis between groups. However, aORIF was associated with a significantly lower rate of superficial infection (p = 0.01), arthroplasty (p = 0.003) and unplanned reoperation (p = 0.005). Subgroup analysis of only the 41C3 fractures showed a lower rate of superficial infections in the aORIF group (p = 0.04). No difference in complications was found between the fracture subgroups.

Conclusion: We found no increased risk of complications with aORIF compared to sORIF for bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. While not all injuries may be appropriate for aORIF, our results demonstrate the safety of aORIF when patients are properly selected by experienced fracture surgeons.

Level of evidence: Level III.

Keywords: Acute fixation; Bicondylar tibial plateau; Orthopaedic trauma; Staged fixation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Schatzker J, McBroom R, Bruce D (1979) The tibial plateau fracture. The toronto experience 1968–1975. Clin Orthop Relat Res 138:94–104
    1. Young MJ, Barrack RL (1994) Complications of internal fixation of tibial plateau fractures. Orthop Rev 23:149–154 - PubMed
    1. Bennett WF, Browner B (1994) Tibial plateau fractures: a study of associated soft tissue injuries. J Orthop Trauma 8:183–188 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Biyani A, Reddy NS, Chaudhury J et al (1995) The results of surgical management of displaced tibial plateau fractures in the elderly. Injury 26:291–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-1383(95)00027-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Subasi M, Kapukaya A, Arslan H et al (2007) Outcome of open comminuted tibial plateau fractures treated using an external fixator. J Orthop Sci 12:347–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-007-1149-7 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources