Comparison of Risk of Stroke in Patients With and Without Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 38410306
- PMCID: PMC10896251
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53057
Comparison of Risk of Stroke in Patients With and Without Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Individuals with depression face an elevated stroke risk, marked by an unfavorable prognosis. This meta-analysis aims to determine the impact of depression on stroke risk. The current meta-analysis was conducted using the guidelines established by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). We selected studies through a systematic review of electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL from January 2011 to January 2023. Google Scholar was utilized to identify supplementary studies. Furthermore, we scrutinized citation lists of reported articles for additional potential studies. Only English-language articles were included in the review. A total of 15 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sample size was 744,179. Sample size of the included studies ranged from 560 to 487,377. The pooled estimate of 15 studies showed that the risk of stroke was 1.47 times higher in individuals with depression compared to the individuals without depression, and the difference is statistically significant (RR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.30 to 1.66, p-value<0.001). Age and hypertension emerged as significant predictors of stroke risk in depressed individuals identified through meta-regression. These findings underscore the importance of targeted preventive strategies for depression-related stroke risk, especially considering age-specific considerations and associated factors.
Keywords: depression; major depressive disorder; risk; stroke; systematic review and meta analysis.
Copyright © 2024, Kanumuri et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Deployment of personnel to military operations: impact on mental health and social functioning.Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 1;14(1):1-127. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.6. eCollection 2018. Campbell Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 37131363 Free PMC article.
-
Association between depression and stroke risk in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Neurol. 2024 Apr 25;15:1331300. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1331300. eCollection 2024. Front Neurol. 2024. PMID: 38725648 Free PMC article.
-
Association between illness representation and psychological distress in stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Jun;94:42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.01.015. Epub 2019 Feb 8. Int J Nurs Stud. 2019. PMID: 30933872
-
Validity of the Spanish-Language Patient Health Questionnaires 2 and 9: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2336529. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.36529. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. PMID: 37847505 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Apixaban and Warfarin in the Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis.Cureus. 2022 Aug 9;14(8):e27838. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27838. eCollection 2022 Aug. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 36134060 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- The size and burden of mental disorders and other disorders of the brain in Europe 2010. Wittchen HU, Jacobi F, Rehm J, et al. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011;21:655–679. - PubMed
-
- Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation. Global Health Data Exchange. [ Jan; 2024 ]. 2023. https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-results https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-results
-
- Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2022 Update: a report from the American Heart Association. Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, et al. Circulation. 2022;145:0–639. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources