Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 27;16(1):e53040.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.53040. eCollection 2024 Jan.

Rigid Esophagoscopy for Foreign Body Extraction: Results and Complications in the Endoscopic Era

Affiliations

Rigid Esophagoscopy for Foreign Body Extraction: Results and Complications in the Endoscopic Era

Pedro L Alexandre et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Introduction Rigid esophagoscopy (RE) has long been a part of otolaryngology practice. In the past decades, the procedure was less commonly performed due to the advances and availability of flexible endoscopic techniques. This study aims to describe the outcomes of RE performed to treat foreign body ingestion and to evaluate risk factors associated with postoperative complications. Methods Patients who underwent RE to treat foreign body ingestion in an otolaryngology emergency department of a Portuguese tertiary university hospital, between 2010 and 2020, were included. A total of 162 cases were analyzed, and data was collected retrospectively. Results The most common foreign bodies were meat bone (31.5%, n = 47), food impaction (28.8%, n = 43), and fish bone (19.5%, n = 29). The proximal esophagus was by far the most frequent location (80%, n = 118). Esophageal perforation occurred in 8% (13 patients), and there was a 2.5% (n = 4) mortality rate. The odds ratio of an esophageal perforation if the foreign body was completely or partially located outside the proximal esophagus was 4.67 times that of a foreign body exclusively in the proximal esophagus (OR = 4.67 [95% CI: 1.39-15.72]; p = 0.016; Fisher's exact test). Conclusion RE remains an effective and important technique in the management of ingested foreign bodies, particularly if endoscopic removal is unsuccessful. Foreign body location outside the proximal esophagus was associated with esophageal perforation.

Keywords: esophageal foreign body; esophageal perforation; foreign body retrieval; rigid esophagoscopy; swallowed foreign body.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Types of foreign bodies
The image shows the foreign bodies identified during rigid esophagoscopy in the order of frequency.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Foreign body location
The proximal esophagus was the most common location (80,3%, n = 118), followed by contiguous locations (6,1%, n = 9), hypopharynx (5,4%, n = 8), middle esophagus (4.8%, n = 7), and distal esophagus (3.4%, n = 5).

References

    1. Esophageal foreign bodies in adults. Herranz-Gonzalez J, Martinez-Vidal J, Garcia-Sarandeses A, Vazquez-Barro C. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;105:649–654. - PubMed
    1. Flexible versus rigid endoscopy in the management of esophageal foreign body impaction: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ferrari D, Aiolfi A, Bonitta G, et al. World J Emerg Surg. 2018;13:42. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Historic development of bronchoesophagology. Marsh BR. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;114:689–716. - PubMed
    1. Management of foreign bodies of the upper gastrointestinal tract: update. Webb WA. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;41:39–51. - PubMed
    1. Development and evaluation of a rigid esophagoscopy simulator for residency training. Allak A, Liu YE, Oliynyk MS, Weng KH, Jameson MJ, Shonka DC. Laryngoscope. 2016;126:616–619. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources