Histological and morphometrical evaluation of the urethral wall after bioresorbable stent implantation in male New Zealand White Rabbits: A preliminary study
- PMID: 38410985
- DOI: 10.14670/HH-18-722
Histological and morphometrical evaluation of the urethral wall after bioresorbable stent implantation in male New Zealand White Rabbits: A preliminary study
Abstract
The aim of the study was the histological and morphometrical evaluation of the urethral wall at three time points after bioresorbable stent implantation in male New Zealand White Rabbits. The research was performed on 26 male New Zealand White rabbits aged 3-4 months and weighing 2.1-3.0 kg. Two models of bioresorbable sodium alginate-based stents were developed and implanted into the urethral lumen for one (T1), three (T3), and six weeks (T6). Sections of 5 µm thickness were cut from the urethra at intervals of 2 mm. The sliced sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin (H&E), Van Gieson's (VG), Von Kossa, and Movat-Russell modified pentachrome (MOVAT) staining methods. The study provided valuable information for future models of urethral stents. The first model of the stent failed to fit the requirements due to inadequate mechanical properties. It curled up on itself losing the ability to adhere to the animals' urethra and was bioresorbed three weeks after implantation. The more rigid no. 2 stent was effective in widening the urethral lumen but did not biodegrade during the experiment. A comprehensive assessment of the second model's properties of biosorption and biointegration requires an extended observation of at least 12 months for an in depth morphological analysis. Stent migration is not likely to be caused solely by the mechanical properties of the urethra or urinary flow but mainly by muscle contraction of the organ wall.
©The Author(s) 2024. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons CC-BY International License.
Similar articles
-
Histological and morphometric evaluation of the urethra and penis in male New Zealand White rabbits.Anat Histol Embryol. 2021 Jan;50(1):136-143. doi: 10.1111/ahe.12611. Epub 2020 Sep 1. Anat Histol Embryol. 2021. PMID: 32869908
-
Biocompatibility properties of a new braided biodegradable urethral stent: a comparison with a biodegradable spiral and a braided metallic stent in the rabbit urethra.BJU Int. 2006 Apr;97(4):856-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06000.x. BJU Int. 2006. PMID: 16536787
-
A bioresorbable urethral stent. An experimental study.Urol Res. 1993 May;21(3):235-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00590042. Urol Res. 1993. PMID: 8342257
-
Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting metallic stents: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Lancet. 2016 Feb 6;387(10018):537-544. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00979-4. Epub 2015 Nov 17. Lancet. 2016. PMID: 26597771 Review.
-
Endourethral prostheses for urethral stricture.Acta Chir Iugosl. 2007;54(3):105-14. doi: 10.2298/aci0703105y. Acta Chir Iugosl. 2007. PMID: 17988041 Review.
References
-
- Barbagli G., Rimondi C., Balò S., Butnaru D., Sansalone S. and Lazzeri M. (2017). Memokath stent failure in recurrent bulbar urethral strictures: Results from an investigative pilot stage 2A study. Urology 107, 246-250. - PubMed
-
- Buckley J.C., Heyns C., Gilling P. and Carney J. (2014). SIU/ICUD consultation on urethral strictures: Dilation, internal urethrotomy, and stenting of male anterior urethral strictures. Urology 83, 18-22. - PubMed
-
- Chepurov A.K., Krivoborodov G.G., Zubarev A.V., Zaitsev N.V. and Markina N.I. (2003). Biodegradable ureteral stents in treating patients with infravesical obstruction. Urologiia 3, 44-50 (in Russian). - PubMed
-
- De Filippo R.E., Kornitzer B.S., Yoo J.J. and Atala A. (2015). Penile urethra replacement with autologous cell-seeded tubularized collagen matrices. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 9, 257-264. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources