Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 5;13(5):e032636.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032636. Epub 2024 Feb 27.

Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Variability and the Impact on Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Variability and the Impact on Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Milly G Wilson et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Abstract

Background: Long-term (visit-to-visit) blood pressure variability (BPV) and heart rate variability (HRV) outside pregnancy are associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Given the limitations of relying solely on blood pressure level to identify pregnancies at risk, long-term (visit-to-visit) BPV or HRV may provide additional diagnostic/prognostic counsel. To address this, we conducted a systematic review to examine the association between long-term BPV and HRV in pregnancy and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes.

Methods and results: Databases were searched from inception to May 2023 for studies including pregnant women, with sufficient blood pressure or heart rate measurements to calculate any chosen measure of BPV or HRV. Studies were excluded that reported short-term, not long-term, variability. Adjusted odds ratios were extracted. Eight studies (138 949 pregnancies) reporting BPV met our inclusion criteria; no study reported HRV and its association with pregnancy outcomes. BPV appeared to be higher in women with hypertension and preeclampsia specifically, compared with unselected pregnancy cohorts. Greater BPV was associated with significantly more adverse pregnancy outcomes, particularly maternal (gestational hypertension [odds ratio range, 1.40-2.15], severe hypertension [1.40-2.20]), and fetal growth (small-for-gestational-age infants [1.12-1.32] or low birth weight [1.18-1.39]). These associations were independent of mean blood pressure level. In women with hypertension, there were stronger associations with maternal outcomes but no consistent pattern for perinatal outcomes.

Conclusions: Future work should aim to confirm whether BPV could be useful for risk stratification prospectively in pregnancy, and should determine the optimal management path for those women identified at increased risk of adverse outcomes.

Keywords: blood pressure variability; fetal growth; hypertension; pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses flow diagram for study inclusion and exclusion.
BPV indicates blood pressure variability; and HRV, heart rate variability.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Mean BPV stratified by participant group.
Individual points represent mean values from individual studies. ARV indicates average real variability; BPV, blood pressure variability; and CV, coefficient of variation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mena LJ, Felix VG, Melgarejo JD, Maestre GE. 24‐Hour blood pressure variability assessed by average real variability: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6:e006895. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006895 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stevens SL, Wood S, Koshiaris C, Law K, Glasziou P, Stevens RJ, McManus RJ. Blood pressure variability and cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta‐analysis. BMJ. 2016;354:i4098. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4098 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Slade L, Wilson M, Mistry HD, Bone JN, Bello N, Blackman M, Syeda N, von Dadelszen P, Magee LA. The 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association blood pressure categories in the second half of pregnancy – a systematic review of their association with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;229:101–117. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.01.013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zeng R, Wang Z, Cheng W, Yang K. Visit‐to‐visit heart rate variability is positively associated with the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:467. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.850223 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan‐a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5:1–10. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types