Fulvestrant and everolimus efficacy after CDK4/6 inhibitor: a prospective study with circulating tumor DNA analysis
- PMID: 38413796
- PMCID: PMC11014798
- DOI: 10.1038/s41388-024-02986-6
Fulvestrant and everolimus efficacy after CDK4/6 inhibitor: a prospective study with circulating tumor DNA analysis
Abstract
In a prospective study (NCT02866149), we assessed the efficacy of fulvestrant and everolimus in CDK4/6i pre-treated mBC patients and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) changes throughout therapy. Patients treated with fulvestrant and everolimus had their ctDNA assessed at baseline, after 3-5 weeks and at disease progression. Somatic mutations were identified in archived tumor tissues by targeted NGS and tracked in cell-free DNA by droplet digital PCR. ctDNA detection was then associated with clinicopathological characteristics and patients' progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and best overall response (BOR). In the 57 included patients, median PFS and OS were 6.8 (95%CI [5.03-11.5]) and 38.2 (95%CI [30.0-not reached]) months, respectively. In 47 response-evaluable patients, BOR was a partial response or stable disease in 15 (31.9%) and 11 (23.4%) patients, respectively. Among patients with trackable somatic mutation and available plasma sample, N = 33/47 (70.2%) and N = 19/36 (52.8%) had ctDNA detected at baseline and at 3 weeks, respectively. ctDNA detection at baseline and PIK3CA mutation had an adverse prognostic impact on PFS and OS in multivariate analysis. This prospective cohort study documents the efficacy of fulvestrant and everolimus in CDK4/6i-pretreated ER + /HER2- mBC and highlights the clinical validity of early ctDNA changes as pharmacodynamic biomarker.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
This work was supported by SIRIC 3 Curie (grant INCa-DGOS-INSERM-ITMO Cancer_18000). FC Bidard received research support and honoraria for advisory board from AstraZeneca and Novartis. F Lerebours reports consulting for AstraZeneca, Eisai, Genomic Health, Eli Lilly, Laboratories Pierre Fabre, and Roche; and travel support from AstraZeneca, Eisai, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Laboratories Pierre Fabre; and lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Novartis, and Laboratories Pierre Fabre. MP Sablin reports lecture fees from Servier. JY Pierga reports consulting for AstraZeneca, Eisai, Eli Lilly, MSD, Gilead, Daiichy Sankyo, Novartis, Pfizer and travel support from AstraZeneca, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Gilead, Seagen, and lecture fees from AstraZeneca, MSD, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Gilead, Veracyte. No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.
Figures





References
-
- Mouridsen H, Gershanovich M, Sun Y, Perez-Carrion R, Boni C, Monnier A, et al. Phase III study of letrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women: analysis of survival and update of efficacy from the International Letrozole Breast Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2003;21:2101–9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.194. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous