Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Feb 27;16(1):44.
doi: 10.1186/s13195-024-01393-z.

GOIZ ZAINDU study: a FINGER-like multidomain lifestyle intervention feasibility randomized trial to prevent dementia in Southern Europe

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

GOIZ ZAINDU study: a FINGER-like multidomain lifestyle intervention feasibility randomized trial to prevent dementia in Southern Europe

Mikel Tainta et al. Alzheimers Res Ther. .

Abstract

Background: GOIZ ZAINDU ("caring early" in Basque) is a pilot study to adapt the Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER) methodology to the Basque population and evaluate the feasibility and adherence to a FINGER-like multidomain intervention program. Additional aims included the assessment of efficacy on cognition and data collection to design a large efficacy trial.

Method: GOIZ ZAINDU is a 1-year, randomized, controlled trial of a multidomain intervention in persons aged 60+ years, with Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging and Dementia (CAIDE) risk score ≥ 6, no diagnosis of dementia, and below-than-expected performance in at least one of three cognitive screening tests. Randomization to a multidomain intervention (MD-Int) or regular health advice (RHA) was stratified by sex, age (>/≤ 75), and cognitive status (mild cognitive impairment (MCI)/normal cognition). MD-Int included cardiovascular risk factor control, nutritional counseling, physical activity, and cognitive training. The primary outcomes were retention rate and adherence to the intervention program. Exploratory cognitive outcomes included changes in the Neuropsychological Test Battery z-scores. Analyses were performed according to the intention to treat.

Results: One hundred twenty-five participants were recruited (mean age: 75.64 (± 6.46); 58% women). The MD-Int (n = 61) and RHA (n = 64) groups were balanced in terms of their demographics and cognition. Fifty-two (85%) participants from the RHA group and 56 (88%) from the MD-Int group completed the study. More than 70% of the participants had high overall adherence to the intervention activities. The risk of cognitive decline was higher in the RHA group than in the MD-Int group in terms of executive function (p =.019) and processing speed scores (p =.026).

Conclusions: The GOIZ-ZAINDU study proved that the FINGER methodology is adaptable and feasible in a different socio-cultural environment. The exploratory efficacy results showed a lower risk of decline in executive function and processing speed in the intervention group. These results support the design of a large-scale efficacy trial.

Trial registration: GOIZ ZAINDU feasibility trial was approved and registered by the Euskadi Drug Research Ethics Committee (ID: PI2017134) on 23 January 2018. Retrospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06163716) on 8 December 2023.

Keywords: Cognitive impairment; Dementia prevention; Lifestyle; Multidomain intervention; Randomized trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

MK is Editor-in-Chief of the journal “Alzheimer’s Research and Therapy”.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
GOIZ ZAINDU study design
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
GOIZ ZAINDU study participant CONSORT flowchart
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean adherence to each intervention component in the MD-Int group

References

    1. Collaborators G 2016 D. Nichols E, Szoeke CEI, Vollset SE, Abbasi N, Abd-Allah F, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18:88–106. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30403-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Soto-Gordoa M, Arrospide A, Moreno-Izco F, Martínez-Lage P, Castilla I, Mar J. Projecting burden of dementia in Spain, 2010–2050: Impact of Modifying Risk factors. J Alzheimer’s Dis. 2015;48:721–30. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150233. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lisko I, Kulmala J, Annetorp M, Ngandu T, Mangialasche F, Kivipelto M. How can dementia and disability be prevented in older adults: where are we today and where are we going? J Intern Med. 2021;289(6):807-30. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Livingston G, Huntley J, Sommerlad A, Ames D, Ballard C, Banerjee S, et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission. Lancet. 2020;396:413–46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30367-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Solomon A, Kivipelto M, Soininen H. Prevention of Alzheimer’s disease: moving backward through the lifespan. J Alzheimer’s Dis. 2013;33(Suppl 1):S465–9. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data