Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2024 May;129(6):1159-1164.
doi: 10.1002/jso.27607. Epub 2024 Feb 27.

Free flap reconstruction at a rural-based tertiary medical college hospital: Barriers and outcomes

Deepak Hongaiah  1 , Abhay K Kattepur  2 , Eldo V George  1 , Abhishek Mahadev M  2 , Deepika Kenkere  3 , Aswathappa Dasappa  2
Affiliations
Observational Study

Free flap reconstruction at a rural-based tertiary medical college hospital: Barriers and outcomes

Deepak Hongaiah et al. J Surg Oncol. 2024 May.

Abstract

Background and objectives: In a rural-based setting, providing optimal treatment is often difficult owing to the limited resources and financial constraints being rampant in cancer care delivery. Oncological resections often result in large, complex defects requiring free flap reconstruction to achieve cosmetic and/or functional goals. This article focuses on our experience of starting and promoting microvascular reconstruction in a rural tertiary medical college hospital.

Methods: Retrospective observational study of patients undergoing free flap reconstruction for oncological indications was included. Standard oncological principles were followed for cancer extirpation. Free flap reconstruction was done using loupes of 4× magnification. Flap-related outcomes and barriers in doing free flap reconstruction were analysed.

Results: A total of 56 patients were included. The most common free flap undertaken was free anterolateral thigh flap in 21 (37.5%) patients. The mean duration of reconstruction was 438 min. Re-exploration was undertaken in 17 patients (30.4%). Nonsalvageable flap loss was 19.64%. Adjuvant treatment was administered in all patients as per oncological indications, albeit with some delay in 12.5%. Barriers to reconstruction were noted in the pre-, intra- and postoperative periods.

Conclusion: Reconstruction with free flaps is feasible in a resource-constrained setup with careful planning and a multidisciplinary team approach to overcome the barriers.

Keywords: barriers; free flaps; outcomes; reconstruction; surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Sathishkumar K, Chaturvedi M, Das P, Stephen S, Mathur P. Cancer incidence estimates for 2022 & projection for 2025: result from National Cancer Registry Programme, India. Indian J Med Res. 2022;156(4):598‐607.
    1. Allareddy V, Konety BR. Characteristics of patients and predictors of in‐hospital mortality after hospitalization for head and neck cancers. Cancer. 2006;106(11):2382‐2388.
    1. Hillner BE, Smith TJ, Desch CE. Hospital and physician volume or specialization and outcomes in cancer treatment: importance in quality of cancer care. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(11):2327‐2340.
    1. Anehosur V, Dikhit PS, Nagraj N, Jayade B, Kumar N. PMMC flap revisited and its clinical outcome in 150 patients. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2020;19(1):26‐31.
    1. Banda CH, Wilson E, Malata CM, et al. Clinical application and outcomes of reconstructive microsurgery in Africa: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022;75(7):2035‐2048.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources