Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 13:15:1354444.
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1354444. eCollection 2024.

Kinesiophobia, limits of stability, and functional balance assessment in geriatric patients with chronic low back pain and osteoporosis: a comprehensive study

Affiliations

Kinesiophobia, limits of stability, and functional balance assessment in geriatric patients with chronic low back pain and osteoporosis: a comprehensive study

Mastour Saeed Alshahrani et al. Front Neurol. .

Abstract

Background: The significance of studying Kinesiophobia, Limits of Stability (LOS), and functional balance in geriatric patients with CLBP and osteoporosis lies in their profound impact on rehabilitation outcomes and fall risk, ultimately affecting patients' quality of life. This study aimed to examine LOS and functional balance in the geriatric population concurrently experiencing Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) and osteoporosis, in comparison to age-matched healthy controls; to assess the correlations between Kinesiophobia, LOS, and functional balance assessments; and to evaluate the mediating influence of Kinesiophobia on the association between LOS and functional balance tests.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included a total of 86 participants in each group. Kinesiophobia was assessed using the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK). LOS variables were evaluated with a computerized Iso-free platform in eight different directions. Functional balance was measured using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test and the Berg Balance Scale (BBS).

Results: Patients with CLBP and osteoporosis showed significantly lower LOS percentages (45.78 ± 6.92) and impaired Functional Balance, reflected in a TUG Score (10.45 ± 2.23), compared to asymptomatic controls (LOS: 76.95 ± 8.21; TUG: 8.73 ± 1.90). Kinesiophobia showed a significant moderate negative correlation with LOS, indicated by r = -0.362 (p < 0.01). Additionally, Kinesiophobia was found to correlate with functional balance tests. Specifically, there was a moderate positive correlation with the TUG Score (r = 0.322, p < 0.01), indicating that higher Kinesiophobia is associated with slower TUG performance. Conversely, a stronger moderate negative correlation was observed with the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) Score (r = -0.436, p < 0.001), suggesting that increased Kinesiophobia is associated with lower BBS scores, indicating poorer balance performance. Mediation analysis revealed that Kinesiophobia significantly influences LOS and Functional Balance. For LOS and the TUG score, Kinesiophobia showed a direct effect (B = 0.24), an indirect effect (B = 0.09), and a total effect (B = 0.13). Similarly, for LOS and the BBS score, the direct effect of Kinesiophobia was B = 0.38, with an indirect effect of B = 0.10 and a total effect of B = 0.20.

Conclusion: This study underscores the substantial impact of Kinesiophobia on both stability and functional balance in individuals coping with CLBP and osteoporosis. The findings emphasize the clinical relevance of addressing Kinesiophobia as a potential target for interventions aimed at improving LOS and functional balance in this specific patient population.

Keywords: Kinesiophobia; chronic low back pain; functional balance; geriatric patients; limits of stability; osteoporosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Assessment of Limits of Stability in eight directions, with (A) depicting the initial starting position and (B) demonstrating the participant’s reaching of a predefined target, as depicted in computerized posturography.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Evaluation of Limits of Stability, with (A) illustrating the initial starting position, and (B) illustrating the participant’s reaching of a determined target.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The Limits of Stability, with (A) representing individuals with Chronic Low Back Pain and osteoporosis, and (B) representing asymptomatic individuals for comparison.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agnus Tom A, Rajkumar E, John R, Joshua GA. Determinants of quality of life in individuals with chronic low back pain: a systematic review. Health Psychol Behav Med. (2022) 10:124–44. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2021.2022487, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kahere M, Ginindza T. Mapping evidence on the prevalence, incidence, risk factors and cost associated with chronic low back pain among adults in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic scoping review protocol. Syst Rev. (2020) 9:57–9. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01321-w, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wong AY, Forss KS, Jakobsson J, Schoeb V, Kumlien C, Borglin G. Older adult’s experience of chronic low back pain and its implications on their daily life: study protocol of a systematic review of qualitative research. Syst Rev. (2018) 7:81–6. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0742-5, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li W, Gong Y, Liu J, Guo Y, Tang H, Qin S, et al. . Peripheral and central pathological mechanisms of chronic low back pain: a narrative review. Journal of pain. Research. (2021) 14:1483–94. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S306280 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wong AY, Karppinen J, Samartzis D. Low back pain in older adults: risk factors, management options and future directions. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. (2017) 12:14–23. doi: 10.1186/s13013-017-0121-3, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed