Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 13:15:1369766.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1369766. eCollection 2024.

Meta-analysis of Montreal cognitive assessment diagnostic accuracy in amnestic mild cognitive impairment

Michael Malek-Ahmadi  1   2 , Nia Nikkhahmanesh  2
Affiliations

Meta-analysis of Montreal cognitive assessment diagnostic accuracy in amnestic mild cognitive impairment

Michael Malek-Ahmadi et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Background: The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is one of the most widely-used cognitive screening instruments and has been translated into several different languages and dialects. Although the original validation study suggested to use a cutoff of ≤26, subsequent studies have shown that lower cutoff values may yield fewer false-positive indications of cognitive impairment. The aim of this study was to summarize the diagnostic accuracy and mean difference of the MoCA when comparing cognitively unimpaired (CU) older adults to those with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI).

Methods: PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched from inception to 22 February 2022. Meta-analyses for area under the curve (AUC) and standardized mean difference (SMD) values were performed.

Results: Fifty-five observational studies that included 17,343 CU and 8,413 aMCI subjects were selected for inclusion. Thirty-nine studies were used in the AUC analysis while 44 were used in the SMD analysis. The overall AUC value was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.87) indicating good diagnostic accuracy and a large effect size was noted for the SMD analysis (Hedge's g = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.33, 1.64). Both analyses had high levels of between-study heterogeneity. The median cutoff score for identifying aMCI was <24.

Discussion and conclusion: The MoCA has good diagnostic accuracy for detecting aMCI across several different languages. The findings of this meta-analysis also support the use of 24 as the optimal cutoff when the MoCA is used to screen for suspected cognitive impairment.

Keywords: cognitive screen; cognitively unimpaired; cutoff score; diagnostic accuracy; mild cognitive impairment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flowchart for literature searches and number of studies selected for inclusion.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of MoCA diagnostic accuracy for amnestic mild cognitive impairment.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot for standardized mean difference of MoCA performance between CU and aMCI groups.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Funnel plots for MoCA diagnostic accuracy (A) and standardized mean difference (B).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ahmed S., de Jager C., Wilcock G. (2012). A comparison of screening tools for the assessment of mild cognitive impairment: preliminary findings. Neurocase 18, 336–351. doi: 10.1080/13554794.2011.608365, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Albert M. S., DeKosky S. T., Dickson D., Dubois B., Feldman H. H., Fox N. C., et al. (2011). The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 7, 270–279. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.008, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aycicek G. S., Çalıskan H., Ozsurekci C., Unsal P., Kessler J., Kalbe E., et al. (2020). A reliable tool for assessing MCI and dementia: validation study of Dem Tect for Turkish population. Am. J. Alzheimers Dis. Other Dement. 35:1533317520949805. doi: 10.1177/1533317520949805 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bartos A., Fayette D. (2018). Validation of the Czech Montreal cognitive assessment for mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer disease and Czech norms in 1, 552 elderly persons. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 46, 335–345. doi: 10.1159/000494489 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bello-Lepe S., Alonso-Sánchez M. F., Ortega A., Gaete M., Veliz M., Lira J., et al. (2020). Montreal cognitive assessment as screening measure for mild and major neurocognitive disorder in a Chilean population. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 10, 105–114. doi: 10.1159/000506280, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources