Gender-based differences exist in the functional knee phenotypes classification of the osteoarthritic knee
- PMID: 38415864
- DOI: 10.1002/ksa.12082
Gender-based differences exist in the functional knee phenotypes classification of the osteoarthritic knee
Abstract
Purpose: To identify gender differences in (1) the coronal alignment of functional knee phenotypes and (2) the JLCA (joint line convergence angle) in relation to the phenotype classification.
Methods: This study is a retrospective data analysis, including 12,099 osteoarthritic knee computed tomography (5025 male, 7074 female) analysed by Medacta software for hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), femoral mechanical angle (FMA), tibial mechanical angle (TMA) and JLCA. The data were grouped into genders and combined according to the Functional Knee Phenotypes Classification.
Results: Out of 127 phenotypes for males and 131 for females, 17 common phenotypes were reported. The commonest four were similar for both genders with VARHKA177° NEUFMA93° NEUTMA87° (9.8% males, 9.50% females), followed by VARHKA174° NEUFMA93°VARTMA84° (7.1%) and VARHKA174°VARFMA90° NEUTMA87° (7.0%) for males and VARHKA174° NEUFMA93° NEUTMA87° (6.1%), VARHKA174° NEUFMA93°VARTMA84° (5.1%) for females. The commonest FMA and TMA (91.5° to 94.5° and 85.5° to 88.5°, respectively) were the same for both genders, however, the rest of the male population observed greater femoral varus than the female population (p < 0.001). JLCA values ranged from -28.4° to 8.2° in the overall study population. Males and females had a mean JLCA of -2.96° (±2.6° SD) and -2.66° (±2.8°7 SD), respectively, p < 0.001.
Conclusions: Gender differences exist within the osteoarthritic knee phenotype. The male varus phenotype is influenced by FMA, while TMA values are similar across genders. JLCA variations show similarities to both TMA and FMA, suggesting JLCA is influenced by bone morphology more than by gender. These differences inform surgical decision-making for the personalised approach to the primary TKA.
Level of evidence: Level III.
Keywords: coronal alignment; gender differences; knee phenotypes; total knee arthroplasty.
© 2024 The Authors. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Beckers L, Colyn W, Bellemans J, Victor J, Vandekerckhove P‐J. The contralateral limb is no reliable reference to restore coronal alignment in TKA. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022;30(2):477–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06152-9
-
- Behrendt P, Akoto R, Bartels I, Thürig G, Fahlbusch H, Korthaus A, et al. Preoperative joint line convergence angle correction is a key factor in optimising accuracy in varus knee correction osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023;31(4):1583–1592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-07092-2
-
- Cherian JJ, Kapadia BH, Banerjee S, Jauregui JJ, Issa K, Mont MA. Mechanical, anatomical, and kinematic axis in TKA: concepts and practical applications. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2014;7(2):89–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-014-9218-y
-
- Graichen H, Luderer V, Strauch M, Hirschmann MT, Scior W. Navigated, gap‐balanced, adjusted mechanical alignment achieves alignment and balancing goals in a very high percentage but with partially non‐anatomical resections. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023;31(3):768–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-07014-2
-
- Hess S, Moser LB, Amsler F, Behrend H, Hirschmann MT. Highly variable coronal tibial and femoral alignment in osteoarthritic knees: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27(5):1368–1377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05506-2
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
