Venetoclax plus daunorubicin and cytarabine in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia patients: A propensity score-matched analysis
- PMID: 38415873
- DOI: 10.1002/hon.3260
Venetoclax plus daunorubicin and cytarabine in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia patients: A propensity score-matched analysis
Abstract
Venetoclax plus 3 + 7 daunorubicin and cytarabine chemotherapy (DAV) has shown safety and efficacy in eligible patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, there are no direct comparisons between DAV and 3 + 7 daunorubicin and cytarabine chemotherapy (DA) alone. We performed a propensity score-matched analysis to compare the outcomes of DAV group with historical DA group and identify the clinical and molecular characteristics of patients who might benefit from the DAV regimen. The DAV group had a higher Complete remission (CR) rate than the DA group (90% vs. 55%, p = 0.008). 25 (96%) patients in the DAV group had a higher MRD-negative CRc rate compared with 13 (62%) patients in the DA group (p = 0.006). After a median follow-up duration of 19.15 (IQR 17.13-21.67) months, the DAV group had an improved overall survival (p = 0.001) and event-free survival (p = 0.069), but not disease-free survival (p = 0.136). Collectively, DAV regimen induced high CR rates and deep MRD-negative CRc rates after one cycle of induction therapy, as well as prolonged the overall survival, in young adult patients with AML who were eligible for intensive chemotherapy. The addition of venetoclax to intensive chemotherapy should be considered in the future to achieve better survival advantages in eligible AML patients.
Keywords: acute myeloid leukemia; propensity score-matched analysis; venetoclax.
© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Yates JW, Wallace HJ, Jr., Ellison RR, Holland JF. Cytosine arabinoside (NSC-63878) and daunorubicin (NSC-83142) therapy in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia. Cancer Chemother Rep. 1973;57(4):485-488.
-
- Fernandez HF, Sun Z, Yao X, et al. Anthracycline dose intensification in acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(13):1249-1259. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0904544
-
- Burnett AK, Russell NH, Hills RK, et al. Optimization of chemotherapy for younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia: results of the medical research council AML15 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(27):3360-3368. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2012.47.4874
-
- Devillier R, Bertoli S, Prébet T, et al. Comparison of 60 or 90 mg/m(2) of daunorubicin in induction therapy for acute myeloid leukemia with intermediate or unfavorable cytogenetics. Am J Hematol. 2015;90(2):E29-E30. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.23884
-
- Lee JH, Kim H, Joo YD, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of idarubicin and high-dose daunorubicin in induction chemotherapy for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(24):2754-2763. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2017.72.8618
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical