Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2024 May 1;159(5):501-509.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.8081.

Outcomes of Women Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery in Veterans Affairs Compared With Non-Veterans Affairs Care Settings

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Outcomes of Women Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery in Veterans Affairs Compared With Non-Veterans Affairs Care Settings

Elizabeth L George et al. JAMA Surg. .

Abstract

Importance: Recent legislation facilitates veterans' ability to receive non-Veterans Affairs (VA) surgical care. Although veterans are predominantly male, the number of women receiving care within the VA has nearly doubled to 10% over the past decade and recent data comparing the surgical care of women in VA and non-VA care settings are lacking.

Objective: To compare postoperative outcomes among women treated in VA hospitals vs private-sector hospitals.

Design, setting, and participants: This coarsened exact-matched cohort study across 9 noncardiac specialties in the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) and American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) took place from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019. Multivariable Poisson models with robust standard errors were used to evaluate the association between VA vs private-sector care settings and 30-day mortality. Hospitals participating in American College of Surgeons NSQIP and VASQIP were included. Data analysis was performed in January 2023. Participants included female patients 18 years old or older.

Exposures: Surgical care in VA or private-sector hospitals.

Main outcomes and measures: Postoperative 30-day mortality and failure to rescue (FTR).

Results: Among 1 913 033 procedures analyzed, patients in VASQIP were younger (VASQIP: mean age, 49.8 [SD, 13.0] years; NSQIP: mean age, 55.9 [SD, 16.9] years; P < .001) and although most patients in both groups identified as White, there were significantly more Black women in VASQIP compared with NSQIP (29.6% vs 12.7%; P < .001). The mean risk analysis index score was lower in VASQIP (13.9 [SD, 6.4]) compared with NSQIP (16.3 [SD, 7.8]) (P < .001 for both). Patients in the VA were more likely to have a preoperative acute serious condition (2.4% vs 1.8%: P < .001), but cases in NSQIP were more frequently emergent (6.9% vs 2.6%; P < .001). The 30-day mortality, complications, and FTR were 0.2%, 3.2%, and 0.1% in VASQIP (n = 36 762 procedures) as compared with 0.8%, 5.0%, and 0.5% in NSQIP (n = 1 876 271 procedures), respectively (all P < .001). Among 1 763 540 matched women (n = 36 478 procedures in VASQIP; n = 1 727 062 procedures in NSQIP), these rates were 0.3%, 3.7%, and 0.2% in NSQIP and 0.1%, 3.4%, and 0.1% in VASQIP (all P < .01). Relative to private-sector care, VA surgical care was associated with a lower risk of death (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 0.41; 95% CI, 0.23-0.76). This finding was robust among women undergoing gynecologic surgery, inpatient surgery, and low-physiologic stress procedures. VA surgical care was also associated with lower risk of FTR (aRR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.18-0.92) for frail or Black women and inpatient and low-physiologic stress procedures.

Conclusions and relevance: Although women comprise the minority of veterans receiving care within the VA, in this study, VA surgical care for women was associated with half the risk of postoperative death and FTR. The VA appears better equipped to meet the unique surgical needs and risk profiles of veterans, regardless of sex and health policy decisions, including funding, should reflect these important outcome differences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Reitz reported grants from the National Institutes of Health National Heart, Lung, and Bone Institute during the conduct of the study. Dr Arya reported grants from the Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development and consultant fees from Gore Medical outside the submitted work. Dr Hall reported grants from the Veterans Health Administration Office of Research and Development during the conduct of the study and personal fees from Future Assured outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Flow Diagram for the Creation of American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) and Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) Cohorts
Surgical specialties included general surgery, gynecology, neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery, otolaryngology, plastic surgery, thoracic surgery, urology, and vascular surgery. OSS indicates operative stress score; RAI, risk analysis index.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Subgroup Evaluation of 30-Day Perioperative Mortality for Women in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Compared With the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP)
Forest plot demonstrates the adjusted risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% CIs of a priori specified subgroups of interest comparing 30-day mortality. OSS indicates operative stress score.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Subgroup Analysis of the Association Between Surgical Care Setting With Risk of Failure to Rescue Following a Complication for Women Undergoing Surgery
Forest plot demonstrates the adjusted risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% CIs of a priori specified subgroups of interest comparing failure to rescue. NSQIP indicates National Surgical Quality Improvement Program; OSS; operative stress score; VASQIP, Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Comment on

  • The MISSION Act Needs Measurement.
    Goodney PP, Ponukumati AS, Newton LE. Goodney PP, et al. JAMA Surg. 2024 May 1;159(5):509-510. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.8082. JAMA Surg. 2024. PMID: 38416508 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. US Department of Veterans Affairs . Veterans Health Administration. Accessed January 25, 2024. https://www.va.gov/health/aboutvha.asp
    1. National Archives . Veterans Community Care Program. Accessed January 25, 2024. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/06/05/2019-11575/veterans...
    1. US Congress . Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014. Accessed January 25, 2024. https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/house-bill/3230
    1. Penn M, Bhatnagar S, Kuy S, et al. . Comparison of wait times for new patients between the private sector and United States Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(1):e187096-e187096. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7096 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Massarweh NN, Itani KMF, Morris MS. The VA MISSION act and the future of veterans’ access to quality health care. JAMA. 2020;324(4):343-344. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.4505 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types