A Diagnostic Dilemma: New Enhancing Suspicious Findings on Breast MRI Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
- PMID: 38416906
- PMCID: PMC11166475
- DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbad035
A Diagnostic Dilemma: New Enhancing Suspicious Findings on Breast MRI Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Abstract
Objective: Evaluate the incidence and outcome of new enhancing findings on breast MRI after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).
Methods: This IRB-approved retrospective review included women with breast cancer undergoing MRI to evaluate NAC response at our institution from January 1, 1998 to March 3, 2021. Post-NAC MRIs given BI-RADS 4 or 5 with new enhancing findings were identified. Patients were excluded if they lacked pretreatment MRI or insufficient follow-up, or if the finding was a satellite of the primary tumor. Medical records and imaging studies were reviewed to identify patients and to find characteristics and outcomes.
Results: Over the study period, 2880 post-NAC breast MRIs were performed. Of 128 post-NAC MRIs given BI-RADS 4 or 5 (4.4%), 35 new suspicious findings were found on 32 MRIs, incidence rate 1.1% (32/2880). Most were characterized as nonmass enhancement (17/35, 49%), followed by mass (11/35, 31%), and then focus (7/35, 20%), with an average maximum dimension of 1.3 cm (range 0.3-7.1 cm). New findings were ipsilateral to the index cancer in 20/35 (57%) of cases. Of the 35 suspicious findings, 22 underwent image-guided biopsy (62%), 1 was surgically excised (3%), 7 underwent mastectomy (20%), 5 were stable or resolved on follow-up (8%), and none were malignant. Thirty-three were benign (94%), and two were benign high-risk lesions (atypical ductal hyperplasia, radial scar) (6%).
Conclusion: New suspicious breast MRI findings after NAC are uncommon with a low likelihood of malignancy. Further study is warranted using multi-institutional data for this low incidence finding.
Keywords: breast MRI; breast cancer; neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
© Society of Breast Imaging 2023. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest Statement
V.L.M. is a consultant for Bayer and receives unrelated research support from Pfizer. The remaining authors have no conflicts to declare.
Figures



References
-
- Murphy BL, Day CN, Hoskin TL, Habermann EB, Boughey JC. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy use in breast cancer is greatest in excellent responders: triple-negative and HER2+ subtypes. Ann Surg Oncol 2018;25(8):2241–2248. - PubMed
-
- Puig CA, Hoskin TL, Day CN, Habermann EB, Boughey JC. National trends in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for hormone receptor-negative breast cancer: a National Cancer Data Base study. Ann Surg Oncol 2017;24(5):1242–1250. - PubMed
-
- Zeidman M, Alberty-Oller JJ, Ru M, et al. Use of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: a National Cancer Database (NCDB) study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020;184(1):203–212. - PubMed
-
- Zeidman M, Schmidt H, Alberty-Oller JJ, et al. Trends in neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus surgery-first in stage I HER2-positive breast cancer patients in the National Cancer DataBase (NCDB). Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021;187(1):177–185. - PubMed
-
- Riedel F, Hoffmann AS, Moderow M, et al. Time trends of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer. Int J Cancer 2020;147(11):3049–3058. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical