Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar-Apr;38(2):833-841.
doi: 10.21873/invivo.13508.

Growth Patterns of Prostate Cancers Undetected by Prostate 3T Multiparametric MRI

Affiliations

Growth Patterns of Prostate Cancers Undetected by Prostate 3T Multiparametric MRI

Kai-Po Chang et al. In Vivo. 2024 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Background/aim: The multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-ultrasound (US) fusion targeted biopsy (TB) is a useful diagnostic device for men with suspected prostate cancer (PC) and can increase the detection rate for clinically significant PCs (csPC). However, few studies have shown pathological findings of undetectable csPCs on the prostate mpMRI.

Patients and methods: This study investigated the growth patterns of csPC undetected in prostate mpMRI. The study enrolled 248 patients with suspected PCs and ≥PI-RADS 2 lesions, who then underwent mpMRI-US fusion TB and nearly prostate-mapping systematic biopsies (SB). A total 248 biopsies included 404 regions of interest in TB and 2976 mapping-regions in SB.

Results: The detection rates of csPC, defined as PC grade group (GG) ≥2, were 42% in TB and 44% in SB, and the highest detection rate was 50%, using both TB and SB. Approximately 79% of PI-RADS 3/4/5 with any PC showed csPC. A total 201 PI-RADS 3/4/5 lesions showed benign prostatic hyperplasia, lymphocytic prostatitis, or fibromuscular stroma only in the core tissues. Notably, 22 csPCs detected in SB but undetected in prostate mpMRI preferentially showed a pattern of mixed well-formed and fused PC glands. The other patterns including cribriform glands and poorly formed glands with intracytoplasmic vacuoles were also seen. Approximately 85% of the 22 csPCs showed tumor volume less than 50% of core tissues.

Conclusion: Changes in prostatic stroma amounts, inflammation severity, tumor volume and growth patterns of PC glands affected the detectability of prostate mpMRI.

Keywords: Multiparametric MRI; biopsy; fusion; pathology; ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The Authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Histopathology of Prostate Imaging–Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 4/5 lesions in targeted biopsies with absence of prostatic cancers. (A) nodular hyperplasia; (B) fibromuscular stroma only; (C) lymphocytic prostatitis. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Pathological findings of undetectable Prostate Imaging–Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) lesions. (A, B) cribriform glands; (C) ductal adenocarcinoma; (D) fused gland; (E) glomeruloid glands; (F) Gleason pattern 5 tumor, with lack of gland formation. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin.

Similar articles

References

    1. Bell KJ, Del Mar C, Wright G, Dickinson J, Glasziou P. Prevalence of incidental prostate cancer: A systematic review of autopsy studies. Int J Cancer. 2015;137(7):1749–1757. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29538. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pu Y. Prostate cancer in Taiwan: epidemiology and risk factors. Int J Androl. 2000;23(S2):34–36. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2605.2000.00012.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cooperberg MR, Pasta DJ, Elkin EP, Litwin MS, Latini DM, Du Chane J, Carroll PR. The University of California, San Francisco cancer of the prostate risk assessment score: A straightforward and reliable preoperative predictor of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2005;173(6):1938–1942. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000158155.33890.e7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Epstein JI, Egevad L, Amin MB, Delahunt B, Srigley JR, Humphrey PA, Grading Committee The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40(2):244–252. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000530. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hassan O, Han M, Zhou A, Paulk A, Sun Y, Al-Harbi A, Alrajjal A, Baptista Dos Santos F, Epstein JI. Incidence of extraprostatic extension at radical prostatectomy with pure Gleason score 3+ 3=6 (grade group 1) cancer: Implications for whether Gleason score 6 prostate cancer should be renamed “not cancer” and for selection criteria for active surveillance. J Urol. 2018;199(6):1482–1487. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.067. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms