Survival Predictors Before Preoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- PMID: 38418152
- PMCID: PMC10905439
- DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13514
Survival Predictors Before Preoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Abstract
Background/aim: Radical resection after preoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a standard treatment for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LAESCC), but its outcome remains unsatisfactory. In order to develop a personalized treatment program for LAES, we herein compared the survival prediction utility of five pre-NAC nutritional, inflammatory, and immune indexes in patients with LAESCC.
Patients and methods: We evaluated the survival of 203 patients with LAESCC who underwent radical resection after NAC from January 2011 to September 2019 for the following representative pre-NAC nutritional, inflammatory, and immune indices: modified Glasgow Prognostic Score, Prognostic Nutritional Index, C-reactive protein/albumin ratio, serum neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, and Geriatric Nutrition Risk Index (GNRI) were evaluated for their impact on survival.
Results: Of the five indices, GNRI was the best predictor of survival as determined by the area under the curve (p<0.05). When patients were divided into three groups according to the nutritional risk assessment of Bouillanne et al. using the pre-NAC GNRI, the 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were significantly stratified (p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, the GNRI independently identified a poor OS group [group 1: hazard ratio (HR)=2.598, p=0.002; group 2: HR=6.257, p<0.001] and a high recurrence risk group (group 1: HR=1.967, p=0.016; group 2: HR=4.467, p<0.001).
Conclusion: In patients with LAESCC, GNRI may be the most accurate, reliable, and useful prognostic factor among the five major systemic inflammatory and nutritional indices.
Keywords: Albumin; body mass index; esophageal cancer; geriatric nutritional risk index; prognosis survival rate.
Copyright © 2024, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The Authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding this study.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Prognostic significance of the prognostic nutritional index in esophageal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Dis Esophagus. 2017 Aug 1;30(8):1-7. doi: 10.1093/dote/dox020. Dis Esophagus. 2017. PMID: 28575242
-
Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index as a prognostic factor in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma -retrospective cohort study.Int J Surg. 2018 Aug;56:44-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.03.052. Epub 2018 Mar 27. Int J Surg. 2018. PMID: 29602015
-
Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index Is an Independent Prognostic Factor for Patients With Esophageal Cancer Who Receive Curative Treatment.Anticancer Res. 2024 Jan;44(1):331-337. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.16816. Anticancer Res. 2024. PMID: 38159974
-
Significance of lymphovascular invasion in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy.Esophagus. 2023 Apr;20(2):215-224. doi: 10.1007/s10388-022-00973-y. Epub 2022 Dec 24. Esophagus. 2023. PMID: 36565340
-
Prognostic Factors for Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery.In Vivo. 2022 Nov-Dec;36(6):2852-2860. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13025. In Vivo. 2022. PMID: 36309376 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The Impact of Worsening Nutritional Status in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Postoperative Outcomes in Esophageal Cancer.In Vivo. 2025 Sep-Oct;39(5):2842-2853. doi: 10.21873/invivo.14084. In Vivo. 2025. PMID: 40877153 Free PMC article.
-
Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index is an effective prognostic predictor for metastatic/recurrent or unresectable esophageal cancer receiving immunotherapy.J Gastrointest Oncol. 2025 Feb 28;16(1):1-16. doi: 10.21037/jgo-24-722. Epub 2025 Feb 26. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40115930 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H, Shinoda M, Ozawa S, Shimizu H, Nakamura T, Yabusaki H, Aoyama N, Kurita A, Ikeda K, Kanda T, Tsujinaka T, Nakamura K, Fukuda H. A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907) Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(1):68–74. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2049-9. - DOI - PubMed
-
- van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, Steyerberg EW, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Wijnhoven BP, Richel DJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Hospers GA, Bonenkamp JJ, Cuesta MA, Blaisse RJ, Busch OR, ten Kate FJ, Creemers GJ, Punt CJ, Plukker JT, Verheul HM, Spillenaar Bilgen EJ, van Dekken H, van der Sangen MJ, Rozema T, Biermann K, Beukema JC, Piet AH, van Rij CM, Reinders JG, Tilanus HW, van der Gaast A, CROSS Group Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(22):2074–2084. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112088. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Takeuchi H, Ikeuchi S, Kitagawa Y, Shimada A, Oishi T, Isobe Y, Kubochi K, Kitajima M, Matsumoto S. Pretreatment plasma fibrinogen level correlates with tumor progression and metastasis in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;22(12):2222–2227. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04736.x. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Tomimaru Y, Yano M, Takachi K, Kishi K, Miyashiro I, Ohue M, Ohigashi H, Sasaki Y, Ishikawa O, Imaoka S. Correlation between pretherapeutic d-dimer levels and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus. 2008;21(4):281–287. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2007.00758.x. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials