Activities used by evidence networks to promote evidence-informed decision-making in the health sector- a rapid evidence review
- PMID: 38418985
- PMCID: PMC10903073
- DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10744-3
Activities used by evidence networks to promote evidence-informed decision-making in the health sector- a rapid evidence review
Abstract
Background: Evidence networks facilitate the exchange of information and foster international relationships among researchers and stakeholders. These networks are instrumental in enabling the integration of scientific evidence into decision-making processes. While there is a global emphasis on evidence-based decision-making at policy and organisational levels, there exists a significant gap in our understanding of the most effective activities to exchange scientific knowledge and use it in practice. The objective of this rapid review was to explore the strategies employed by evidence networks to facilitate the translation of evidence into decision-making processes. This review makes a contribution to global health policymaking by mapping the landscape of knowledge translation in this context and identifying the evidence translation activities that evidence networks have found effective.
Methods: The review was guided by standardised techniques for conducting rapid evidence reviews. Document searching was based on a phased approach, commencing with a comprehensive initial search strategy and progressively refining it with each subsequent search iterations. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement was followed.
Results: The review identified 143 articles, after screening 1135 articles. Out of these, 35 articles were included in the review. The studies encompassed a diverse range of countries, with the majority originating from the United States (n = 14), followed by Canada (n = 5), Sweden (n = 2), and various other single locations (n = 14). These studies presented a varied set of implementation strategies such as research-related activities, the creation of teams/task forces/partnerships, meetings/consultations, mobilising/working with communities, influencing policy, activity evaluation, training, trust-building, and regular meetings, as well as community-academic-policymaker engagement.
Conclusions: Evidence networks play a crucial role in developing, sharing, and implementing high-quality research for policy. These networks face challenges like coordinating diverse stakeholders, international collaboration, language barriers, research consistency, knowledge dissemination, capacity building, evaluation, and funding. To enhance their impact, sharing network efforts with wider audiences, including local, national, and international agencies, is essential for evidence-based decision-making to shape evidence-informed policies and programmes effectively.
Keywords: Decision-making; Evidence dissemination; Evidence network; Evidence-informed; Health policy; Knowledge broker; Knowledge translation.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
AFK is co-chair of the Evidence 2 Action Thematic Working Group, which was responsible to partially fund this work.
CM is co-chair of the Evidence 2 Action Thematic Working Group, which was responsible to partially fund this work.
All other authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Outcomes of an integrated knowledge translation approach in five African countries: a mixed-methods comparative case study.Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Dec 10;22(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01256-x. Health Res Policy Syst. 2024. PMID: 39658798 Free PMC article.
-
Individual and institutional capacity-building for evidence-informed health policy-making in Iran: a mix of local and global evidence.Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Feb 12;20(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00816-3. Health Res Policy Syst. 2022. PMID: 35151312 Free PMC article.
-
Research evidence communication for policy-makers: a rapid scoping review on frameworks, guidance and tools, and barriers and facilitators.Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Aug 8;22(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01169-9. Health Res Policy Syst. 2024. PMID: 39118156 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Factors influencing the utilization of Traditional Chinese Medicine in cancer treatment: a qualitative meta-synthesis of patient and healthcare professional perspectives.Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Mar 5;12:1501918. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1501918. eCollection 2025. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025. PMID: 40109719 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of the determinants for using health research evidence in health planning in Tanzania: a cross-sectional study.PLoS One. 2025 May 28;20(5):e0316508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316508. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40435352 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Stewart R. Do evidence networks make a difference? J Dev Effect. 2018;10(1):171–178. doi: 10.1080/19439342.2018.1425734. - DOI
-
- Caribbean Health Research Council . Translating health research to action: a toolkit for the Caribbean. 2008.
-
- Share-Net International Digital Platform . Share-net international digital platform. 2023.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous