Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Feb 29;24(1):261.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10744-3.

Activities used by evidence networks to promote evidence-informed decision-making in the health sector- a rapid evidence review

Affiliations
Review

Activities used by evidence networks to promote evidence-informed decision-making in the health sector- a rapid evidence review

Germán Andrés Alarcón Garavito et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Evidence networks facilitate the exchange of information and foster international relationships among researchers and stakeholders. These networks are instrumental in enabling the integration of scientific evidence into decision-making processes. While there is a global emphasis on evidence-based decision-making at policy and organisational levels, there exists a significant gap in our understanding of the most effective activities to exchange scientific knowledge and use it in practice. The objective of this rapid review was to explore the strategies employed by evidence networks to facilitate the translation of evidence into decision-making processes. This review makes a contribution to global health policymaking by mapping the landscape of knowledge translation in this context and identifying the evidence translation activities that evidence networks have found effective.

Methods: The review was guided by standardised techniques for conducting rapid evidence reviews. Document searching was based on a phased approach, commencing with a comprehensive initial search strategy and progressively refining it with each subsequent search iterations. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement was followed.

Results: The review identified 143 articles, after screening 1135 articles. Out of these, 35 articles were included in the review. The studies encompassed a diverse range of countries, with the majority originating from the United States (n = 14), followed by Canada (n = 5), Sweden (n = 2), and various other single locations (n = 14). These studies presented a varied set of implementation strategies such as research-related activities, the creation of teams/task forces/partnerships, meetings/consultations, mobilising/working with communities, influencing policy, activity evaluation, training, trust-building, and regular meetings, as well as community-academic-policymaker engagement.

Conclusions: Evidence networks play a crucial role in developing, sharing, and implementing high-quality research for policy. These networks face challenges like coordinating diverse stakeholders, international collaboration, language barriers, research consistency, knowledge dissemination, capacity building, evaluation, and funding. To enhance their impact, sharing network efforts with wider audiences, including local, national, and international agencies, is essential for evidence-based decision-making to shape evidence-informed policies and programmes effectively.

Keywords: Decision-making; Evidence dissemination; Evidence network; Evidence-informed; Health policy; Knowledge broker; Knowledge translation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

AFK is co-chair of the Evidence 2 Action Thematic Working Group, which was responsible to partially fund this work.

CM is co-chair of the Evidence 2 Action Thematic Working Group, which was responsible to partially fund this work.

All other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The PRISMA Flow Diagram

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stewart R. Do evidence networks make a difference? J Dev Effect. 2018;10(1):171–178. doi: 10.1080/19439342.2018.1425734. - DOI
    1. Mansilla C, Herrera CA, Basagoitia A, Pantoja T. The evidence-informed policy network (EVIPNet) in Chile: lessons learned from a year of coordinated efforts. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública. 2017;43:e36. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Caribbean Health Research Council . Translating health research to action: a toolkit for the Caribbean. 2008.
    1. Stewart R, Boutron I, Akl EA. The global evidence Commission’s report provided a wake-up call for the evidence community. J Clin Epidemiol. 2023;154:212–215. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.10.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Share-Net International Digital Platform . Share-net international digital platform. 2023.

LinkOut - more resources