Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 28;10(1):44.
doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01471-x.

Pragmatic Return to Effective Dental Infection Control through Triage and Testing (PREDICT): an observational, feasibility study to improve dental office safety

Affiliations

Pragmatic Return to Effective Dental Infection Control through Triage and Testing (PREDICT): an observational, feasibility study to improve dental office safety

Janine Fredericks-Younger et al. Pilot Feasibility Stud. .

Abstract

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a substantial interruption of care, with patients and workers fearful to return to the dental office. As dental practice creates a highly aerosolized environment, the potential for spread of airborne illness is magnified. As a means to increase safety and mitigate risk, pre-visit testing for SARS-CoV-2 has the potential to minimize disease transmission in dental offices. The Pragmatic Return to Effective Dental Infection Control through Testing (PREDICT) Feasibility Study examined the logistics and impact of two different testing mechanisms (laboratory-based PCR viral testing and point-of-care antigen testing) in dental offices.

Methods: Dental healthcare workers (DHCWs) and patients in four dental offices within the National Dental Practice-based Research Network participated in this prospective study. In addition to electronic surveys, participants in two offices completed POC testing, while participants in two offices used lab-based PCR methods to detect SARS-CoV-2 infection. Analysis was limited to descriptive measures, with median and interquartile ranges reported for Likert scale responses and mean and standard deviation for continuous variables.

Results: Of the total 72 enrolled, 28 DHCWs and 41 patients completed the protocol. Two patients (4.9%) tested positive prior to their visit, while 2 DHCWs (12.5%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection at the start of the study. DHCWs and patients shared similar degree of concern (69% and 63%, respectively) for contracting COVID-19 from patients, while patients feared contracting COVID-19 from DHCWs less (49%). Descriptive statistics calculations revealed that saliva, tongue epithelial cells, and nasal swabs were the most desirable specimen collection method; both testing (LAB and POC) protocols took similar amounts of total time to complete; and DHCWs and patients reported feeling more comfortable when both groups were tested.

Conclusions: While a larger-scale, network study is necessary for generalizability of results, this feasibility study suggests that SARS-CoV-2 testing can be effectively implemented into dental practice workflows and positively impact perception of safety for DHCWs and patients. As new virulent infectious diseases emerge, preparing dental personnel to employ an entire toolbox of risk mitigation strategies, including testing, may have the potential to decrease dental practice closure time, maintaining continuity of dental care services for patients.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05123742.

Keywords: COVID-19 testing; Continuity of patient care; Dental; Dental care; Dental offices; Feasibility studies; Health personnel; Infection control; Perception; SARS-CoV-2; Workforce.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PREDICT Protocols: LAB and POC protocols for dental healthcare workers and the LAB and POC protocols for patient participants
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Participant enrollment and completion status for dental healthcare worker and patient participants in the LAB and POC designated offices

Update of

References

    1. Petrovan SO, Aldridge DC, Bartlett H, Bladon AJ, Booth H, Broad S, Broom DM, Burgess ND, Cleaveland S, Cunningham AA, Ferri M, Hinsley A, Hua F, Hughes AC, Jones K, Kelly M, Mayes G, Radakovic M, Ugwu CA, Uddin N, Veríssimo D, Walzer C, White TB, Wood JL, Sutherland WJ. Post COVID-19: a solution scan of options for preventing future zoonotic epidemics. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2021;96(6):2694–2715. doi: 10.1111/brv.12774. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khan G. A novel coronavirus capable of lethal human infections: an emerging picture. Virol J. 2013;28(10):66. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-10-66. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Telenti A, Hodcroft EB, Robertson DL. The evolution and biology of SARS-CoV-2 variants. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2022;12(5):a041390. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a041390. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McAlister FA, Parikh H, Lee DS, Wijeysundera HC. Health care implications of the COVID-19 pandemic for the cardiovascular practitioner. Can J Cardiol. 2022:S0828–282X(22)01051–0. 10.1016/j.cjca.2022.11.014. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36481398; PMCID: PMC9721374. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cha AE, Cohen RA. Dental care utilization among adults aged 18–64: United States, 2019 and 2020. NCHS Data Brief. 2022;435:1–8. - PubMed

Associated data