MRSA infection, re-infection and clinical outcomes in diabetic foot infections
- PMID: 38419162
- DOI: 10.1111/wrr.13164
MRSA infection, re-infection and clinical outcomes in diabetic foot infections
Abstract
The aim was to investigate methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) incidence, conversion and outcomes in diabetic foot infections (DFIs). This is a pooled patient-level analysis of combined data sets from two randomised clinical trials including 219 patients admitted to the hospital with moderate or severe DFIs. Intraoperative bone and tissue cultures identified bacterial pathogens. We identified pathogens at index infections and subsequent re-infections. We identified MRSA conversion (MSSA to MRSA) in re-infections. MRSA incidence in index infections was 10.5%, with no difference between soft tissue infections (STIs) and osteomyelitis (OM). MRSA conversion occurred in 7.7% of the re-infections in patients who initially had MSSA in their cultures. Patients with re-infection were 2.2 times more likely to have MRSA compared to the first infection (10.5% vs. 25.8%, relative risk [RR] = 2.2, p = 0.001). Patients with MRSA had longer antibiotic treatment during the 1-year follow-up, compared to other pathogens (other 49.8 ± 34.7 days, MRSA 65.3 ± 41.5 days, p = 0.04). Furthermore, there were no differences in healing, time to heal, length of stay, re-infection, amputation, re-ulceration, re-admission, surgery after discharge and amputation after discharge compared to other pathogens. The incidence of MRSA at the index was 10.5% with no difference in STI and OM. MRSA incidence was 25.8% in re-infections. The RR of having MRSA was 2.2 times higher in re-infections. Patients with MRSA used more antibiotics during the 1-year follow-up. Furthermore, there were no differences in clinical outcomes compared to other bacterial pathogens.
Keywords: MRSA; amputation; diabetes; foot; infection; osteomyelitis; ulcer.
© 2024 The Authors. Wound Repair and Regeneration published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Wound Healing Society.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Lavery LA, Fontaine JL, Bhavan K, Kim PJ, Williams JR, Hunt NA. Risk factors for methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus in diabetic foot infections. Diabet Foot Ankle. 2014;5:228‐231. doi:10.3402/dfa.v5.23575
-
- Skiest DJ, Brown K, Cooper TW, Hoffman‐Roberts H, Mussa HR, Elliott AC. Prospective comparison of methicillin‐susceptible and methicillin‐resistant community‐associated Staphylococcus aureus infections in hospitalized patients. J Infect. 2007;54(5):427‐434. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2006.09.012
-
- van Asten SA, La Fontaine J, Peters EJ, Bhavan K, Kim PJ, Lavery LA. The microbiome of diabetic foot osteomyelitis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;35(2):293‐298. doi:10.1007/s10096‐015‐2544‐1
-
- Lavery LA, Davis KE, La Fontaine J, et al. Does negative pressure wound therapy with irrigation improve clinical outcomes? A randomized clinical trial in patients with diabetic foot infections. Am J Surg. 2020;220(4):1076‐1082. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.02.044
-
- Lavery LA, Ryan EC, Ahn J, et al. The infected diabetic foot: re‐evaluating the Infectious Diseases Society of America diabetic foot infection classification. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;70(8):1573‐1579. doi:10.1093/cid/ciz489
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical