Strength-trained adults demonstrate greater corticoreticular activation versus untrained controls
- PMID: 38419404
- DOI: 10.1111/ejn.16297
Strength-trained adults demonstrate greater corticoreticular activation versus untrained controls
Abstract
The rapid increase in strength following strength-training involves neural adaptations, however, their specific localisation remains elusive. Prior focus on corticospinal responses prompts this study to explore the understudied cortical/subcortical adaptations, particularly cortico-reticulospinal tract responses, comparing healthy strength-trained adults to untrained peers. Fifteen chronically strength-trained individuals (≥2 years of training, mean age: 24 ± 7 years) were compared with 11 age-matched untrained participants (mean age: 26 ± 8 years). Assessments included maximal voluntary force (MVF), corticospinal excitability using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), spinal excitability (cervicomedullary stimulation), voluntary activation (VA) and reticulospinal tract (RST) excitability, utilizing StartReact responses and ipsilateral motor-evoked potentials (iMEPs) for the flexor carpi radialis muscle. Trained participants had higher normalized MVF (6.4 ± 1.1 N/kg) than the untrained participants (4.8 ± 1.3 N/kg) (p = .003). Intracortical facilitation was higher in the strength-trained group (156 ± 49%) (p = .02), along with greater VA (98 ± 3.2%) (p = .002). The strength-trained group displayed reduced short-interval-intracortical inhibition (88 ± 8.0%) compared with the untrained group (69 ± 17.5%) (p < .001). Strength-trained individuals exhibited a greater normalized rate of force development (38.8 ± 10.1 N·s-1/kg) (p < .009), greater reticulospinal gain (2.5 ± 1.4) (p = .02) and higher ipsilateral-to-contralateral MEP ratios compared with the untrained group (p = .03). Strength-trained individuals displayed greater excitability within the intrinsic connections of the primary motor cortex and the RST. These results suggest greater synaptic input from the descending cortico-reticulospinal tract to α-motoneurons in strength-trained individuals, thereby contributing to the observed increase in VA and MVF.
Keywords: StartReact protocol; reticulospinal tract; strength‐training; transcranial magnetic stimulation.
© 2024 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience published by Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Aagaard, P., Bojsen‐Møller, J., & Lundbye‐Jensen, J. (2020). Assessment of neuroplasticity with strength training. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 48(4), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1249/JES.0000000000000229
-
- Aagaard, P., Simonsen, E. B., Andersen, J. L., Magnusson, P., & Dyhre‐Poulsen, P. (2002). Neural adaptation to resistance training: Changes in evoked V‐wave and H‐reflex responses. Journal of Applied Physiology (1985), 92(6), 2309–2318. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01185.2001
-
- Ansdell, P., Brownstein, C. G., Škarabot, J., Angius, L., Kidgell, D., Frazer, A., Hicks, K. M., Durbaba, R., Howatson, G., Goodall, S., & Thomas, K. (2020). Task‐specific strength increases after lower‐limb compound resistance training occurred in the absence of corticospinal changes in vastus lateralis. Experimental Physiology, 105(7), 1132–1150. https://doi.org/10.1113/EP088629
-
- Anzak, A., Tan, H., Pogosyan, A., & Brown, P. (2011). Doing better than your best: Loud auditory stimulation yields improvements in maximal voluntary force. Experimental Brain Research, 208(2), 237–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2474-1
-
- Atkinson, E., Škarabot, J., Ansdell, P., Goodall, S., Howatson, G., & Thomas, K. (2022). Does the reticulospinal tract mediate adaptation to resistance training in humans? Journal of Applied Physiology, 133(3), 689–696. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00264.2021
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
