Concomitant use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and percutaneous microaxial assist device support for cardiogenic shock
- PMID: 38420544
- PMCID: PMC10897678
- DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.12.005
Concomitant use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and percutaneous microaxial assist device support for cardiogenic shock
Abstract
Objectives: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) with concomitant percutaneous microaxial left ventricular assist device support is an emerging treatment modality for cardiogenic shock (CS). Survival outcomes by CS etiology with this support strategy have not been well described.
Methods: This study was a retrospective, single-center analysis of patients with CS due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) or decompensated heart failure (ADHF-CS) supported with VA-ECMO with concomitant percutaneous microaxial left ventricular assist device support from December 2020 to January 2023.
Results: A total of 44 patients were included (AMI-CS, n = 20, and ADHF-CS, n = 24). Patients with AMI-CS and ADHF-CS had similar survival at 90 days postdischarge (P = .267) with similar destinations after support (P = .220). Patients with AMI-CS initially supported with VA-ECMO were less likely to survive 90 days postdischarge (P = .038) when compared with other cohorts. Limb ischemia and acute kidney injury occurred more frequently in patients presenting with AMI-CS (P =.013; P = .030). Subanalysis of ADHF-CS patients into acute-on-chronic decompensated HF and de novo HF demonstrated no difference in survival or destination.
Conclusions: VA-ECMO with concomitant percutaneous microaxial left ventricular assist device support can be used to successfully manage patients with CS. There is no difference in survival or destination for AMI-CS and ADHF-CS with this support strategy. AMI-CS patients with initial VA-ECMO support have increased mortality in comparison to other cohorts. Future multicenter studies are required to fully analyze the differences between AMI-CS and ADHF-CS with this support strategy.
Keywords: ADHF-CS; AMI-CS; VA-ECMO; cardiogenic; pVAD; shock.
© 2023 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Dr Kaczorowski has received consultant and speaking fees from Medtronic and Abiomed and has an intellectual property interest in ECMOTek LLC. Dr Hickey has received speaking fees from Abiomed. Mr Klass receives consultant fees from Boston Scientific. All other authors reported no conflicts of interest. The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest.
Figures




Update of
-
Concomitant Use of VA-ECMO and Impella Support for Cardiogenic Shock.medRxiv [Preprint]. 2023 Jul 27:2023.07.24.23293127. doi: 10.1101/2023.07.24.23293127. medRxiv. 2023. Update in: JTCVS Open. 2023 Dec 21;17:152-161. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.12.005. PMID: 37546750 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
Similar articles
-
Concomitant Use of VA-ECMO and Impella Support for Cardiogenic Shock.medRxiv [Preprint]. 2023 Jul 27:2023.07.24.23293127. doi: 10.1101/2023.07.24.23293127. medRxiv. 2023. Update in: JTCVS Open. 2023 Dec 21;17:152-161. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.12.005. PMID: 37546750 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
-
Prospective Comparison of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device and Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Following Acute Myocardial Infarction.J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 May 7;8(9):e012171. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012171. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019. PMID: 31041870 Free PMC article.
-
Outcome of patients with non-ischaemic cardiogenic shock supported by percutaneous left ventricular assist device.ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Oct;8(5):3594-3602. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13546. Epub 2021 Aug 23. ESC Heart Fail. 2021. PMID: 34424614 Free PMC article.
-
Extracorporeal Life Support in Myocardial Infarction: New Highlights.Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 May 30;60(6):907. doi: 10.3390/medicina60060907. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024. PMID: 38929524 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Left Ventricular Unloading During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Feb 19;73(6):654-662. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.085. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019. PMID: 30765031
References
-
- van Diepen S., Katz J.N., Albert N.M., Henry T.D., Jacobs A.K., Kapur N.K., et al. Contemporary management of cardiogenic shock: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;136:e232–e268. - PubMed
-
- Wayangankar S.A., Bangalore S., McCoy L.A., Jneid H., Latif F., Karrowni W., et al. Temporal trends and outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions for cardiogenic shock in the setting of acute myocardial infarction: a report from the CathPCI Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:341–351. - PubMed
-
- Adams K.F., Fonarow G.C., Emerman C.L., LeJemtel T.H., Costanzo M.R., Abraham W.T., et al. Characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized for heart failure in the United States: rationale, design, and preliminary observations from the first 100,000 cases in the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE) Am Heart J. 2005;149:209–216. - PubMed
-
- Shah M., Patnaik S., Patel B., Ram P., Garg L., Agarwal M., et al. Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States. Clin Res Cardiol. 2018;107:287–303. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous