Weight-based enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis in young trauma patients: analysis of the CLOTT-1 registry
- PMID: 38420604
- PMCID: PMC10900334
- DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001230
Weight-based enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis in young trauma patients: analysis of the CLOTT-1 registry
Abstract
Introduction: Optimal venous thromboembolism (VTE) enoxaparin prophylaxis dosing remains elusive. Weight-based (WB) dosing safely increases anti-factor Xa levels without the need for routine monitoring but it is unclear if it leads to lower VTE risk. We hypothesized that WB dosing would decrease VTE risk compared with standard fixed dosing (SFD).
Methods: Patients from the prospective, observational CLOTT-1 registry receiving prophylactic enoxaparin (n=5539) were categorized as WB (0.45-0.55 mg/kg two times per day) or SFD (30 mg two times per day, 40 mg once a day). Multivariate logistic regression was used to generate a predicted probability of VTE for WB and SFD patients.
Results: Of 4360 patients analyzed, 1065 (24.4%) were WB and 3295 (75.6%) were SFD. WB patients were younger, female, more severely injured, and underwent major operation or major venous repair at a higher rate than individuals in the SFD group. Obesity was more common among the SFD group. Unadjusted VTE rates were comparable (WB 3.1% vs. SFD 3.9%; p=0.221). Early prophylaxis was associated with lower VTE rate (1.4% vs. 5.0%; p=0.001) and deep vein thrombosis (0.9% vs. 4.4%; p<0.001), but not pulmonary embolism (0.7% vs. 1.4%; p=0.259). After adjustment, VTE incidence did not differ by dosing strategy (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.75, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.48); however, early administration was associated with a significant reduction in VTE (aOR 0.47, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.74).
Conclusion: In young trauma patients, WB prophylaxis is not associated with reduced VTE rate when compared with SFD. The timing of the initiation of chemoprophylaxis may be more important than the dosing strategy. Further studies need to evaluate these findings across a wider age and comorbidity spectrum.
Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic/care management.
Keywords: Multiple Trauma; Thromboembolism; Venous thromboembolism; observational study.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: SL reported receiving fees from Oakstone Publishing for completed work. LK reported receiving personal fees from Cerus SAB outside the submitted work. BB reported receiving grants from the US Department of Defense during the conduct of the study. MDC reported receiving grants from the US Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity during the conduct of the study. BC reported receiving grants from the National Trauma Institute during the conduct of the study. ERH reported receiving grants from the US Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity during the conduct of the study and grants from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and the Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, and speaker fees from Vizient (paid speaker for the Vizient Hospital Improvement Innovation Network VTE Prevention Acceleration Network) outside the submitted work. AJK reported receiving grants from the US Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity during the conduct of the study. LNK reported receiving grants from the Coalition for National Trauma Research of the US Department of Defense during the conduct of the study. MJM reported receiving grants from the US Department of Defense during the conduct of the study. AM reported receiving grants from the National Trauma Institute during the conduct of the study. CEW reported having stock in Decisio and receiving grants from Grifols outside the submitted work. GCV reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health during the conduct of the study.
Figures
References
-
- Guyatt GH, Eikelboom JW, Gould MK, Garcia DA, Crowther M, Murad MH, Kahn SR, Falck-Ytter Y, Francis CW, Lansberg MG, et al. . Approach to outcome measurement in the prevention of thrombosis in surgical and medical patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012;141:e185S–e194S. 10.1378/chest.11-2289 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Ley EJ, Brown CVR, Moore EE, Sava JA, Peck K, Ciesla DJ, Sperry JL, Rizzo AG, Rosen NG, Brasel KJ, et al. . Updated guidelines to reduce venous thromboembolism in trauma patients: a Western Trauma Association critical decisions algorithm. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2020;89:971–81. 10.1097/TA.0000000000002830 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Rappold JF, Sheppard FR, Carmichael Ii SP, Cuschieri J, Ley E, Rangel E, Seshadri AJ, Michetti CP. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in the trauma intensive care unit: an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Critical Care Committee Clinical Consensus Document. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2021;6:e000643. 10.1136/tsaco-2020-000643 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials