Patients With and Without Double Crush Syndrome Achieve Similar Rates of Clinical Improvement Following Carpal Tunnel Release
- PMID: 38420760
- PMCID: PMC11571791
- DOI: 10.1177/15589447241233764
Patients With and Without Double Crush Syndrome Achieve Similar Rates of Clinical Improvement Following Carpal Tunnel Release
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of carpal tunnel release (CTR) in patients with and without double crush syndrome (DCS), defined as concurrent carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and cervical radiculopathy at C5-T1 on preoperative nerve conduction studies.
Methods: Patients with preoperative nerve conduction studies who underwent unilateral, isolated CTR were retrospectively identified. All patients completed preoperative and 3-month postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) upper extremity (UE) and pain interference (PI), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaires, and responded to the anchor question: "Since your treatment, how would you rate your overall function?" (much worse, worse, slightly worse, no change, slightly improved, improved, much improved). Preoperative, postoperative, and changes in scores for UE, PI, and QuickDASH were compared, as were the anchor question responses and rates of achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID).
Results: Sixty-three patients with DCS and 115 patients with CTS only were included. At 3- to 4-month follow-up, absolute and change in UE, PI, and QuickDASH scores were not statistically different between patients with DCS and CTS. Rates of anchor question response and MCID achievement were comparable for patients with CTS only and DCS on each questionnaire. The MCID achievement ranged from 48.4% to 68.8% in the unmatched cohort and 48.4% to 60% in the matched group.
Conclusions: At 3 to 4 months, patients with DCS experience similar patient-reported symptomatic and functional improvement, and achieve MCID of outcome measures at comparable rates to patients with CTS only. For patients with nerve compression at the carpal tunnel and cervical spine, CTR is a reasonable first step prior to proceeding with cervical spine decompression.
Keywords: carpal tunnel syndrome; cervical radiculopathy; double crush syndrome; patient-reported outcomes; peripheral nerve.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Similar articles
-
Minimal Clinically Important Difference After Carpal Tunnel Release Using the PROMIS Platform.J Hand Surg Am. 2019 Nov;44(11):947-953.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 May 6. J Hand Surg Am. 2019. PMID: 31072663 Free PMC article.
-
What are the Minimum Clinically Important Difference Values for the PROMIS and QuickDASH After Carpal Tunnel Release? A Prospective Cohort Study.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Apr 1;481(4):766-774. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002437. Epub 2022 Oct 3. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023. PMID: 36190518 Free PMC article.
-
Minimal Clinically Important Differences for PROMIS Physical Function, Upper Extremity, and Pain Interference in Carpal Tunnel Release Using Region- and Condition-Specific PROM Tools.J Hand Surg Am. 2019 Aug;44(8):635-640. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.04.004. Epub 2019 May 22. J Hand Surg Am. 2019. PMID: 31126813
-
Double Crush Syndrome.J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015 Sep;23(9):558-62. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00176. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015. PMID: 26306807 Review.
-
Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 8;1(1):CD001552. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001552.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38189479 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous