Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 1;53(2):afae025.
doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae025.

New horizons in frailty identification via electronic frailty indices: early implementation lessons from experiences in England and the United States

Affiliations

New horizons in frailty identification via electronic frailty indices: early implementation lessons from experiences in England and the United States

Ariela R Orkaby et al. Age Ageing. .

Abstract

Frailty represents an integrative prognostic marker of risk that associates with a myriad of age-related adverse outcomes in older adults. As a concept, frailty can help to target scarce resources and identify subgroups of vulnerable older adults that may benefit from interventions or changes in medical management, such as pursing less aggressive glycaemic targets for frail older adults with diabetes. In practice, however, there are several operational challenges to implementing frailty screening outside the confines of geriatric medicine. Electronic frailty indices (eFIs) based on the theory of deficit accumulation, derived from routine data housed in the electronic health record, have emerged as a rapid, feasible and valid approach to screen for frailty at scale. The goal of this paper is to describe the early experience of three diverse groups in developing, implementing and adopting eFIs (The English National Health Service, US Department of Veterans Affairs and Atrium Health-Wake Forest Baptist). These groups span different countries and organisational complexity, using eFIs for both research and clinical care, and represent different levels of progress with clinical implementation. Using an implementation science framework, we describe common elements of successful implementation in these settings and set an agenda for future research and expansion of eFI-informed initiatives.

Keywords: deficit accumulation; electronic health record; frailty; implementation science; older people; population health management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Wake Forest University Health Sciences has an interest in making electronic screening tools such as the electronic frailty index (eFI), a commercial product in the future so that other hospitals and clinics could use it for their patients. Therefore, N.P. and K.C. and Wake Forest University Health Sciences could financially benefit from future sales of an eFI application. A.O. and J.D. led the development of the VA frailty index, which is freely available. A.C. led the development and national implementation of the eFI in England, which is licenced to suppliers of electronic health record systems and risk stratification software at no cost on the basis that a premium charge is not then subsequently applied to the end National Health Service user.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Potential opportunities for clinical interventions informed by frailty screening. ACP denotes advanced care planning. Many of the potential interventions could be utilised across the spectrum of frailty. For example, physical activity or other exercise interventions could also be beneficial in moderate frailty.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston Jet al. . Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2001; 56: M146–57. - PubMed
    1. Rockwood K, Mitnitski A. Frailty in relation to the accumulation of deficits. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci 2007; 62: 722–7. - PubMed
    1. Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet 2013; 381: 752–62. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lambden S, Laterre PF, Levy MM, Francois B. The SOFA score-development, utility and challenges of accurate assessment in clinical trials. Crit Care 2019; 23: 374. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goff DC, Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett Get al. . 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk. Circulation 2014; 129: S49–73. - PubMed

Publication types