What is the effect of reducing the air change rate on the ventilation effectiveness in ultra-clean operating rooms?
- PMID: 38423130
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.02.007
What is the effect of reducing the air change rate on the ventilation effectiveness in ultra-clean operating rooms?
Abstract
Background: The operating room (OR) department is one of the most energy-intensive departments of a hospital. The majority of ORs in the Netherlands have an air-handling installation with an ultra-clean ventilation system. However, not all surgeries require an ultra-clean OR.
Aim: To determine the effect of reducing the air change rate on the ventilation effectiveness in ultra-clean ORs.
Methods: Lower air volume ventilation effectiveness (VELv) of conventional ventilation (CV), controlled dilution ventilation (cDV), temperature-controlled airflow (TcAF) and unidirectional airflow (UDAF) systems were evaluated within a 4 × 4 m measuring grid of 1 × 1 m. The VELv was defined as the recovery degree (RD), cleanliness recovery rate (CRR) and air change effectiveness (ACE).
Findings: The CV, cDVLv and TcAFLv ventilation systems showed a comparable mixing character in all areas (A, B and AB) when reducing the air change rate to 20/h. Ventilation effectiveness decreased when the air change rate was reduced, with the exception of the ACE. At all points for the UDAF-2Lv and at the centre point (C3) of the TcAFLv, higher RD10Lv and CRRLv were measured when compared with the other examined ventilation systems.
Conclusions: The ventilation effectiveness decreased when an ultra-clean OR with an ultra-clean ventilation air-supply system was switched to an air change rate of 20/h. Reducing the air change rate in the OR from an ultra-clean OR to a generic OR will reduce the recovery degree (RD10) by a factor of 10-100 and the local air change rate (CRR) by between 42% and 81%.
Keywords: Air change effectiveness; Cleanliness recovery rate; Operating room; Recovery degree; Ultra-clean ventilation systems; Ventilation effectiveness.
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Baseline Study of Ultra-Clean Air Change Rate, Number, and Type of Microorganisms and Level of Particles During Trauma Surgery.HERD. 2025 Jan;18(1):142-156. doi: 10.1177/19375867241302406. Epub 2024 Dec 5. HERD. 2025. PMID: 39633611 Free PMC article.
-
Operating room ventilation systems: recovery degree, cleanliness recovery rate and air change effectiveness in an ultra-clean area.J Hosp Infect. 2022 Apr;122:115-125. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2021.12.018. Epub 2021 Dec 30. J Hosp Infect. 2022. PMID: 34974079 Review.
-
Temperature-controlled airflow ventilation in operating rooms compared with laminar airflow and turbulent mixed airflow.J Hosp Infect. 2018 Feb;98(2):181-190. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.10.013. Epub 2017 Oct 24. J Hosp Infect. 2018. PMID: 29074054
-
Comparison of number of airborne bacteria in operating rooms with turbulent mixing ventilation and unidirectional airflow when using reusable scrub suits and single-use scrub suits.J Hosp Infect. 2023 May;135:119-124. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.03.012. Epub 2023 Mar 22. J Hosp Infect. 2023. PMID: 36963617
-
[State of the art and scientific evidence on the role of unidirectional airflow ventilation systems in reducing surgical site infections].Ann Ig. 2010 Jul-Aug;22(4):369-81. Ann Ig. 2010. PMID: 21425647 Review. Italian.
Cited by
-
Baseline Study of Ultra-Clean Air Change Rate, Number, and Type of Microorganisms and Level of Particles During Trauma Surgery.HERD. 2025 Jan;18(1):142-156. doi: 10.1177/19375867241302406. Epub 2024 Dec 5. HERD. 2025. PMID: 39633611 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous