A Systematic Review of the Single-Item Burnout Question: Its Reliability Depends on Your Purpose
- PMID: 38424346
- PMCID: PMC11043289
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-08685-y
A Systematic Review of the Single-Item Burnout Question: Its Reliability Depends on Your Purpose
Abstract
Background: Surveillance of burnout by the gold-standard Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) is hindered by cost and length. The validity and benchmarking of the commonly recommended and used single-item burnout question (SIBOQ) are unknown. We sought to (1) derive an equation for predicting the gold standard MBI from the SIBOQ and (2) measure the correlation of the SIBOQ with the full MBI and its subscales.
Methods: We sought studies in PubMed along with citations by and to included studies. We included studies that either correlated the SIBOQ and the MBI or reported the rates of burnout measured by both instruments. Two reviewers extracted data and CLARITY risk of bias. We used generalized linear mixed regression to separately quantify the predictive (benchmarking) and explanatory (hot-spotting) capabilities of the SIBOQ. We created a regression equation for converting SIBOQ scores to MBI scores. We meta-analyzed correlation coefficients (r) for the SIBOQ and MBI subscales. For all analyses, we considered an r of 0.7 as acceptable reliability for group-level comparisons.
Results: We included 17 studies reporting 6788 respondents. All studies had a high risk of bias, as no study had a response rate over 75% and no study was able to examine non-responders. The correlations (r) of the SIBOQ with the overall MBI were explanatory r = 0.82 and predictive r = 0.56. Regarding MBI subscales, the correlations of the SIBOQ with emotional exhaustion were adequate with r = 0.71 (95% CI 0.67-0.74; I2 = 89%), and depersonalization was r = 0.44 (95% CI 0.34-0.52; I2 = 90%). However, in 8 of 15 comparisons, the r was less than 0.70.
Discussion: The SIBOQ's usually adequate explanatory abilities allow "hot-spotting" to identify subgroups with high or low burnout within a single, homogenous survey fielding. However, the predictive ability of the SIBOQ indicates insufficient reliability in comparing local results to external benchmarks.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Validation of the Maslach burnout inventory-general survey 9-item short version (MBI-GS9) among care aides in Canadian nursing homes.BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 16;25(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12235-5. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025. PMID: 39819504 Free PMC article.
-
[A meta-analysis of job burnout using the MBI scale].Encephale. 2007 Dec;33(6):947-53. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2006.10.001. Epub 2007 Sep 4. Encephale. 2007. PMID: 18789787 French.
-
Concurrent validity of single-item measures of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization in burnout assessment.J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Nov;27(11):1445-52. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2015-7. Epub 2012 Feb 24. J Gen Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22362127 Free PMC article.
-
Psychometric properties of burnout measures: a systematic review.Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2021 Jan 13;30:e8. doi: 10.1017/S2045796020001134. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2021. PMID: 33436137 Free PMC article.
-
Professional burnout among medical students: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis.Med Teach. 2019 Feb;41(2):172-183. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1457213. Epub 2018 Apr 14. Med Teach. 2019. PMID: 29656675
Cited by
-
Comment on study by Hagan et al.: The Single-Item Burnout Question.J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Dec;39(16):3356-3357. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09016-x. Epub 2024 Sep 11. J Gen Intern Med. 2024. PMID: 39261339 No abstract available.
References
-
- Maslach CT, Jackson SE. The measurement of experienced burnout. J Organ Behav. 1981;2(2):99–113. doi: 10.1002/job.4030020205. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources