Indigenous approaches to health assessment: a scoping review protocol
- PMID: 38424631
- PMCID: PMC10903070
- DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02496-2
Indigenous approaches to health assessment: a scoping review protocol
Abstract
Background: Health assessment tools developed using mainstream or Western concepts have been widely used in clinical practice worldwide. However, even culturally adapted or culturally based tools may not be relevant in other social contexts if they are grounded in Western beliefs and perspectives. The application of mainstream assessment tools, when used in Indigenous populations, can lead to the inappropriate application of normative data and inaccurate or biased diagnosis of conditions as Indigenous concepts of health differ from Western biomedical concepts of health. Thus, considering the need for culturally meaningful, sensitive, safe, and unbiased health assessment approaches and instruments over recent years, tools have been developed or adapted by and with Indigenous populations in Australia, Aotearoa/New Zealand, Canada, and the United States. However, there is no existing systematic or scoping review to identify the methods and approaches used in adapting or developing health assessment tools for use with the Indigenous population in Australia, Aotearoa/New Zealand, Canada, and the United States.
Methods: In response to these gaps, we are working with a First Nations Community Advisory Group in Northern Ontario, Canada, to undertake a scoping review following the 2020 JBI methodology for scoping reviews. A systematic search will be conducted in PubMed, APA PsychINFO, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Bibliography of Native North Americans, Australian Indigenous Health info data set, and Indigenous Health Portal. Two reviewers will independently screen all abstracts and full-text articles for inclusion using criteria co-developed with an advisory group. We will chart the extracted information and summarize and synthesize the data. The summarized findings will be presented to a Community Advisory Group, including First Nations community partners, an Elder, and community members, and their feedback will be incorporated into the discussion section of the scoping review.
Discussion: This scoping review involves iterative consultation with the Indigenous and non-Indigenous scholars, First Nations Community Advisory Group, and community partners throughout the research process. This review aims to summarize the evidence on standard ethical approaches and practices used in Indigenous research while adapting or developing health assessment tools. It will inform the larger study focused on developing an Indigenous Functional Assessment tool. Further, it will seek whether the Indigenous ways of knowing and equitable participation of Indigenous people and communities are incorporated in the Indigenous research process.
Systematic review registration: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/yznwk .
Keywords: Culturally safe; Health assessment; Indigenous approaches; Indigenous health; Indigenous knowledge; Scoping review.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Elevating the uses of storytelling approaches within Indigenous health research: a critical and participatory scoping review protocol involving Indigenous people and settlers.Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 4;9(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01503-6. Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33148328 Free PMC article.
-
Characteristics of Indigenous primary health care models of service delivery: a scoping review protocol.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):43-51. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2474. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. PMID: 26657463
-
Knowledge translation in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander research contexts in Australia: scoping review protocol.BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 15;12(7):e060311. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060311. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35840302 Free PMC article.
-
A Systematic Scoping Review of Indigenous People's Experience of Healing and Recovery from Child Sexual Abuse.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Mar 7;21(3):311. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21030311. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38541310 Free PMC article.
-
Use and uptake of web-based therapeutic interventions amongst Indigenous populations in Australia, New Zealand, the United States of America and Canada: a scoping review.Syst Rev. 2020 May 31;9(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01374-x. Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32475342 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Measuring Wellness Through Indigenous Partnerships: A Scoping Review.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Dec 31;22(1):43. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22010043. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39857496 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Corntassel J. Who is indigenous? ‘Peoplehood’ and ethnonationalist approaches to rearticulating indigenous identity. National Ethnic Polit. 2003;9(1):75–100. doi: 10.1080/13537110412331301365. - DOI
-
- Walker J, Lovett R, Kukutai T, Jones C, Henry D. Indigenous health data and the path to healing. Lancet. 2017;390(10107):2022–3. [cited 2022 Feb 2]. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85032705611&origin=... - PubMed
-
- Richmond CA, Ross NA, Bernier J. Exploring Indigenous concepts of health: the dimensions of Métis and Inuit health. Aboriginal Policy Res Consortium International (APRCi). 4(115). Available from: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/aprci/115
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources