Effect of decreasing PEEP on hyperinflation and collapse in COVID-19: A computed tomography study
- PMID: 38425207
- DOI: 10.1111/aas.14401
Effect of decreasing PEEP on hyperinflation and collapse in COVID-19: A computed tomography study
Abstract
Background: High positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP>10 cmH2O) is commonly used in mechanically ventilated hypoxemic patients with COVID-19. However, some epidemiological and physiological studies indirectly suggest that using a lower PEEP may primarily and beneficially decrease lung hyperinflation in this population. Herein we directly quantified the effect of decreasing PEEP from 15 to 10 cmH2O on lung hyperinflation and collapse in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19.
Methods: Twenty mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 underwent a lung computed tomography (CT) at PEEP of 15 and 10 cmH2O. The effect of decreasing PEEP on lung hyperinflation and collapse was directly quantified as the change in the over-aerated (density below -900 HU) and non-aerated (density above -100 HU) lung volumes. The net response to decreasing PEEP was computed as the sum of the change in those two compartments and expressed as the change in the "pathologic" lung volume. If the pathologic lung volume decreased (i.e., hyperinflation decreased more than collapse increased) when PEEP was decreased, the net response was considered positive; otherwise, it was considered negative.
Results: On average, the ratio of arterial tension to inspiratory fraction of oxygen (PaO2:FiO2) in the overall study population was 137 (119-162) mmHg. In 11 (55%) patients, the net response to decreasing PEEP was positive. Their over-aerated lung volume decreased by 159 (98-186) mL, while the non-aerated lung volume increased by only 58 (31-91) mL. In nine (45%) patients, the net response was negative. Their over-aerated lung volume decreased by 46 (18-72) mL, but their non-aerated lung volume increased by 107 (44-121) mL.
Conclusion: In 20 patients with COVID-19 the net response to decreasing PEEP, as assessed with lung CT, was variable. In approximately half of them it was positive (and possibly beneficial), with a decrease in hyperinflation larger than the increase in collapse.
© 2024 Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Alhazzani W, Evans L, Alshamsi F, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign guidelines on the management of adults with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) in the ICU: first update. Crit Care Med. 2021;49:e219‐e234.
-
- Grasselli G, Greco M, Zanella A, et al. Risk factors associated with mortality among patients with COVID‐19 in intensive care units in Lombardy, Italy. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180:1345‐1355.
-
- Protti A, Santini A, Pennati F, et al. Lung response to a higher positive end‐expiratory pressure in mechanically‐ventilated patients with COVID‐19. Chest. 2021;161:979‐988.
-
- Gattinoni L, Caironi P, Cressoni M, et al. Lung recruitment in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1775‐1786.
-
- Dreyfuss D, Saumon G. Ventilator‐induced lung injury: lessons from experimental studies. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;157:294‐323.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
