The characteristics and predictors of mortality in periprosthetic fractures around the knee
- PMID: 38425310
- DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B2.BJJ-2023-0700.R1
The characteristics and predictors of mortality in periprosthetic fractures around the knee
Abstract
Aims: Periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) around the knee are challenging injuries. This study aims to describe the characteristics of knee PPFs and the impact of patient demographics, fracture types, and management modalities on in-hospital mortality.
Methods: Using a multicentre study design, independent of registry data, we included adult patients sustaining a PPF around a knee arthroplasty between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2019. Univariate, then multivariable, logistic regression analyses were performed to study the impact of patient, fracture, and treatment on mortality.
Results: Out of a total of 1,667 patients in the PPF study database, 420 patients were included. The in-hospital mortality rate was 6.4%. Multivariable analyses suggested that American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, history of peripheral vascular disease (PVD), history of rheumatic disease, fracture around a loose implant, and cerebrovascular accident (CVA) during hospital stay were each independently associated with mortality. Each point increase in ASA grade independently correlated with a four-fold greater mortality risk (odds ratio (OR) 4.1 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19 to 14.06); p = 0.026). Patients with PVD have a nine-fold increase in mortality risk (OR 9.1 (95% CI 1.25 to 66.47); p = 0.030) and patients with rheumatic disease have a 6.8-fold increase in mortality risk (OR 6.8 (95% CI 1.32 to 34.68); p = 0.022). Patients with a fracture around a loose implant (Unified Classification System (UCS) B2) have a 20-fold increase in mortality, compared to UCS A1 (OR 20.9 (95% CI 1.61 to 271.38); p = 0.020). Mode of management was not a significant predictor of mortality. Patients managed with revision arthroplasty had a significantly longer length of stay (median 16 days; p = 0.029) and higher rates of return to theatre, compared to patients treated nonoperatively or with fixation.
Conclusion: The mortality rate in PPFs around the knee is similar to that for native distal femur and neck of femur fragility fractures. Patients with certain modifiable risk factors should be optimized. A national PPF database and standardized management guidelines are currently required to understand these complex injuries and to improve patient outcomes.
© 2024 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.
Conflict of interest statement
A. A. H. H. Nasser and A. Mahmood report funding from Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham Charity Trauma Research and Education Fund, related to this study.
References
-
- Ben-Shlomo Y , Blom A , Boulton C , et al. The National Joint Registry 19th Annual Report 2022 . National Joint Registry . 2022 . https://reports.njrcentre.org.uk/Portals/0/PDFdownloads/NJR%2019th%20Ann... ( date last accessed 5 December 2023 ).
-
- Bottle A , Griffiths R , White S , et al. Periprosthetic fractures: the next fragility fracture epidemic? A national observational study . BMJ Open . 2020 ; 10 ( 12 ): e042371 . 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042371 33303466
-
- Bhattacharyya T , Chang D , Meigs JB , Estok DM 2nd , Malchau H . Mortality after periprosthetic fracture of the femur . J Bone Joint Surg Am . 2007 ; 89-A ( 12 ): 2658 – 2662 . 10.2106/JBJS.F.01538 18056498
-
- Hernefalk B , Brüggemann A , Mohammed J , Mukka S , Wolf O . Lower mortality in distal femoral fractures in the presence of a knee arthroplasty: an observational study on 2,725 fractures from the Swedish Fracture Register . Acta Orthop . 2022 ; 93 : 684 – 688 . 10.2340/17453674.2022.4376 35866693
-
- Shields E , Behrend C , Bair J , Cram P , Kates S . Mortality and financial burden of periprosthetic fractures of the femur . Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil . 2014 ; 5 ( 4 ): 147 – 153 . 10.1177/2151458514542281 26246936
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical