Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 7;51(1):42-51.
doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1775592. eCollection 2024 Jan.

Smooth versus Textured Tissue Expanders: Comparison of Outcomes and Complications in 536 Implants

Affiliations

Smooth versus Textured Tissue Expanders: Comparison of Outcomes and Complications in 536 Implants

Omar Allam et al. Arch Plast Surg. .

Abstract

Background Increasing concerns regarding the safety of textured surface implants have resulted in surgeons transitioning from textured tissue expanders (TEs) to smooth TEs. Given this change has only recently occurred, this study evaluated outcomes between smooth and textured TEs. Methods Women who underwent two-stage breast reconstruction using TEs from 2013 to 2022 were included. TE-specific variables, perioperative information, pain scores, and complications were collected. Chi-squared, t -test, and linear regression analyses were performed. Results A total of 320 patients received a total of 384 textured and 152 smooth TEs. Note that 216 patients received bilateral reconstruction. TEs were removed in 9 cases. No significant differences existed between groups regarding comorbidities. Smooth TEs had a higher proportion of prepectoral placement ( p < 0.001). Smooth TEs had less fills (3 ± 1 vs. 4 ± 2, p < 0.001), shorter expansion periods (60 ± 44 vs. 90 ± 77 days, p < 0.001), smaller expander fill volumes (390 ± 168 vs. 478 ± 177 mL, p < 0.001), and shorter time to exchange (80 ± 43 vs. 104 ± 39 days, p < 0.001). Complication rates between textured and smooth TEs were comparable. Smooth TE had a greater proportion of TE replacements ( p = 0.030). On regression analysis, pain scores were more closely associated with age ( p = 0.018) and TE texture ( p = 0.046). Additional procedures at time of TE exchange ( p < 0.001) and textured TE ( p = 0.017) led to longer operative times. Conclusion As many surgeons have transitioned away from textured implants, our study shows that smooth TEs have similar outcomes to the textured alternatives.

Keywords: breast reconstruction; complications; tissue expanders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest M.A. receives funding from CTSA Grant Number KL2 TR001862 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and consults for Johnson & Johnson and LifeNet Health. The manuscript contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NIH.

References

    1. Alderman A K, Collins E D, Schott A et al. The impact of breast reconstruction on the delivery of chemotherapy. Cancer. 2010;116(07):1791–1800. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Olfatbakhsh A, Haghighat S, Tabari M et al. Patient satisfaction and body image following mastectomy, breast-conserving therapy, and mastectomy with reconstruction: a study in Iran. Arch Breast Cancer. 2018;5:173–182.
    1. Momoh A O, Cohen W A, Kidwell K M et al. Tradeoffs associated with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women choosing breast reconstruction: results of a prospective multicenter cohort. Ann Surg. 2017;266(01):158–164. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jagsi R, Jiang J, Momoh A O et al. Trends and variation in use of breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer undergoing mastectomy in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(09):919–926. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wilkins E G, Alderman A K. Breast reconstruction practices in North America: current trends and future priorities. Paper presented at: Seminars in Plastic Surgery; 2004. - PMC - PubMed