Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2024 Jun 1;20(6):983-990.
doi: 10.5664/jcsm.11082.

Validation of a sleep staging classification model for healthy adults based on two combinations of a single-channel EEG headband and wrist actigraphy

Affiliations
Observational Study

Validation of a sleep staging classification model for healthy adults based on two combinations of a single-channel EEG headband and wrist actigraphy

Mariana Cardoso Melo et al. J Clin Sleep Med. .

Abstract

Study objectives: The aim of this study was to develop a sleep staging classification model capable of accurately performing on different wearable devices.

Methods: Twenty-three healthy participants underwent a full-night type I polysomnography and used two device combinations: (A) flexible single-channel electroencephalogram (EEG) headband + actigraphy (n = 12) and (B) rigid single-channel EEG headband + actigraphy (n = 11). The signals were segmented into 30-second epochs according to polysomnographic stages (scored by a board-certified sleep technologist; model ground truth) and 18 frequency and time features were extracted. The model consisted of an ensemble of bagged decision trees. Bagging refers to bootstrap aggregation to reduce overfitting and improve generalization. To evaluate the model, a training dataset under 5-fold cross-validation and an 80-20% dataset split was used. The headbands were also evaluated without the actigraphy feature. Participants also completed a usability evaluation (comfort, pain while sleeping, and sleep disturbance).

Results: Combination A had an F1-score of 98.4% and the flexible headband alone of 97.7% (error rate for N1: combination A = 9.8%; flexible headband alone = 15.7%). Combination B had an F1-score of 96.9% and the rigid headband alone of 95.3% (error rate for N1: combination B = 17.0%; rigid headband alone = 27.7%); in both, N1 was more confounded with N2.

Conclusions: We developed an accurate sleep classification model based on a single-channel EEG device, and actigraphy was not an important feature of the model. Both headbands were found to be useful, with the rigid one being more disruptive to sleep. Future research can improve our results by applying the developed model in a population with sleep disorders.

Clinical trial registration: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Actigraphy, Wearable EEG Band and Smartphone for Sleep Staging; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04943562; Identifier: NCT04943562.

Citation: Melo MC, Vallim JRS, Garbuio S, et al. Validation of a sleep staging classification model for healthy adults based on 2 combinations of a single-channel EEG headband and wrist actigraphy. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(6):983-990.

Keywords: electroencephalogram; polysomnography; sleep tracking; sleep wearables.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have seen and approved the manuscript. Work for this study was performed at SleepUp Tecnologia em Saúde Ltda. This study was funded by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) no. 2020/00666-2. G.N.P., R.R.B., and K.M.M.S. are shareholders; M.C.M. and J.R.d.S.V. are researchers; and L.A.S. and S.G. are advisors at SleepUp.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Five-class confusion matrixes for combinations A and B.
(A) The 5-class confusion matrix is shown for combination A (flexible EEG headband + actigraphy) and without the actigraphy feature. (B) The confusion matrix is shown for combination B (rigid EEG headband + actigraphy) and without the actigraphy feature. The columns represent the original or expected class distribution, and the rows represent the predicted or output distribution by the classifier. EEG = electroencephalogram, FDR = false discovery rate, FNR = false negative rate, PPV = positive predictive value, REM = rapid eye movement, TPR = true positive rate.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Single-channel EEG headband usability ratings.
Single-channel EEG headband usability ratings for (A) level of comfort, (B) pain while sleeping with the headband, and (C) level of sleep disturbance. One participant did not complete the level of comfort and level of sleep disturbance ratings for the rigid headband assessment. EEG = electroencephalogram.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • 2024 Standardization of Polysomnography Reports - A Consensus of the Brazilian Sleep Association.
    Palombini LO, Mello LIL, Santos-Silva R, Assis M, Cunha TCA, Drager LF, Zancanella E, Alves RC, Bacelar A, Bagnato MDC, Balsalobre RA, Bianchini EMG, Brasil EL, Coelho FMS, Duarte BB, Eckeli AL, Fabbro CD, Franco AM, Genta PR, Giannasi LC, Miguel MAL, Moreira GA, Naufel MF, Pereira LMS, Poyares D, Pradella-Hallinan M, Soares CFP, Soster LA, Zanini MA, Pires GN. Palombini LO, et al. Sleep Sci. 2024 Dec 17;17(4):e429-e450. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1800886. eCollection 2024 Dec. Sleep Sci. 2024. PMID: 39698178 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Troester MM , Quan SF , Berry RB , et al; for the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. The AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events: Rules, Terminology and Technical Specifications. Version 3. Darien, IL: : American Academy of Sleep Medicine; ; 2023. .
    1. Pires GN , Arnardóttir ES , Islind AS , Leppänen T , McNicholas WT . Consumer sleep technology for the screening of obstructive sleep apnea and snoring: current status and a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy . J Sleep Res. 2023. ; 32 ( 4 ): e13819 . - PubMed
    1. Vaughn BV , Giallanza P . Technical review of polysomnography . Chest. 2008. ; 134 ( 6 ): 1310 – 1319 . - PubMed
    1. Khosla S , Deak MC , Gault D , et al. American Academy of Sleep Medicine Board of Directors . Consumer sleep technology: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine position statement . J Clin Sleep Med. 2018. ; 14 ( 5 ): 877 – 880 . - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leppänen T , Varon C , de Zambotti M , Myllymaa S . Editorial: machine learning and wearable technology in sleep medicine . Front Digit Health. 2022. ; 4 : 845879 , . - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources