Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar;18(3):101091.
doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101091. Epub 2024 Feb 1.

Loss of a grooming enrichment impacts physical, behavioural, and physiological measures of welfare in grazing beef cattle

Affiliations
Free article

Loss of a grooming enrichment impacts physical, behavioural, and physiological measures of welfare in grazing beef cattle

Emily J Dickson et al. Animal. 2024 Mar.
Free article

Abstract

Pasture-based beef cattle are raised in a range of production environments. Some paddocks may contain trees and other objects that allow for grooming, hence being naturally enriching, whilst others may be barren without these opportunities. Additionally, it is not uncommon for cattle to move between these enriched and barren environments as part of routine management. While the benefits of enrichment are well studied, how this 'enrichment loss' impacts cattle welfare as access to stimuli is removed is unknown. This trial assessed the impacts of the loss of an enriching object (grooming brush) on grazing beef cattle welfare and production characteristics. When grooming brush access was blocked, cattle became dirtier, showed reduced average daily gain, and had elevated faecal cortisol metabolites, although this varied according to the degree of initial individual brush use. Additionally, allogrooming and grooming on other objects were reduced when access to the brush was returned, potentially indicating a rebound effect. These results demonstrate that the loss of adequate grooming objects can impair the overall welfare of grazing cattle; however, further work is needed to determine exactly which natural or artificial objects provide adequate grooming opportunities.

Keywords: Angus; Brush; Extensive management; Positive Welfare; Steers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Brush Use in Lot-Fed Cattle Shows Continued Use and Positive Behaviour.
    Dunston-Clarke EJ, Stockman C, Sinclair J, Collins T. Dunston-Clarke EJ, et al. Animals (Basel). 2024 Dec 27;15(1):44. doi: 10.3390/ani15010044. Animals (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39794987 Free PMC article.
  • Welfare of beef cattle.
    EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW); Nielsen SS, Alvarez J, Boklund A, Dippel S, Dorea F, Figuerola J, Herskin MS, Michel V, Miranda Chueca MA, Nannoni E, Nonno R, Riber AB, Stahl K, Stegeman JA, Thulke HH, Tuyttens F, Cozzi G, Knierim U, Martí S, Mullan S, Ashe S, Cecchinato G, Lima E, Mosbach-Schulz O, Vitali M, Zanna MB, Winckler C. EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW), et al. EFSA J. 2025 Jul 25;23(7):e9518. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9518. eCollection 2025 Jul. EFSA J. 2025. PMID: 40718745 Free PMC article.

LinkOut - more resources