Antimicrobial Activity of Antibacterial Sutures in Oral Surgery: A Scoping Review
- PMID: 38429145
- PMCID: PMC11287137
- DOI: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.01.029
Antimicrobial Activity of Antibacterial Sutures in Oral Surgery: A Scoping Review
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this scoping review was to explore and synthesise the current evidence on the antimicrobial activity of antibacterial suture materials used in oral surgery.
Methods: The review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Extension for Scoping Reviews. A bibliographic search was carried out in the PubMed and Scopus databases to retrieve all human clinical studies that investigated the antimicrobial efficacy of antibacterial-coated sutures used in oral surgery. Included studies were screened and extracted independently by 2 examiners. Data were tabulated and qualitatively described.
Results: The search initially returned 150 articles and resulted in 5 included studies after the duplicates' removal and the full-text screening. Selected studies were published from 2014 to 2019. Three studies (60%) were randomised clinical trials, whilst the remaining studies did not report information on randomisation. The antimicrobial agents for coated sutures included triclosan and chlorhexidine. In almost all the studies, antibacterial-coated sutures exhibited lower bacterial retention compared to those without coating.
Conclusions: Within limitations, the antimicrobial-coated sutures employed in oral surgery exhibited good results in terms of their microbicidal activity when compared with sutures that were not coated. Considering the high variability and confounding factors identified in the included studies, more high-quality research is needed to confirm these results. Antimicrobial-coated sutures could represent a promising and clinically valid strategy to reduce microbial colonisation in oral surgery. The reduced bacterial adherence is likely to improve the clinical success of the surgical procedures. Yet, the cost-benefit ratio of antimicrobial-coated sutures should be assessed in larger clinical trials to confirm their efficacy over conventional noncoated sutures.
Keywords: Antibacterial-coated suture; Chlorhexidine; Oral bacteria; Oral surgery; Scoping review; Triclosan.
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest None disclosed.
Similar articles
-
How well do antibacterial sutures control microbial colonization after oral surgery?Evid Based Dent. 2025 Mar;26(1):44-45. doi: 10.1038/s41432-024-01069-5. Epub 2024 Sep 23. Evid Based Dent. 2025. PMID: 39313600
-
Comparison of bacterial colonization on absorbable non-coated suture with Triclosan- or Chlorhexidine-coated sutures: a randomized controlled study.Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 Sep;27(18):8371-8383. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202309_33760. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023. PMID: 37782154 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative evaluation of sutures coated with triclosan and chlorhexidine for oral biofilm inhibition potential and antimicrobial activity against periodontal pathogens: An in vitro study.Indian J Dent Res. 2016 Sep-Oct;27(5):535-539. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.195644. Indian J Dent Res. 2016. PMID: 27966513
-
Alcoholic chlorhexidine skin preparation or triclosan-coated sutures to reduce surgical site infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of high-quality randomised controlled trials.Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Aug;22(8):1242-1251. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00133-5. Epub 2022 May 26. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022. PMID: 35644158
-
The use of triclosan-coated sutures to prevent surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 3;9(9):e029727. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029727. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31481559 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Scalability of API-Loaded Multifilament Yarn Production by Hot-Melt Extrusion and Evaluation of Fiber-Based Dosage Forms.Pharmaceutics. 2024 Aug 22;16(8):1103. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16081103. Pharmaceutics. 2024. PMID: 39204448 Free PMC article.
-
Microbiological Analysis of Bacterial Plaque on Various Suture Types Used in Third Molar Surgical Extraction: a Systematic Review.J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2025 Jun 30;16(2):e3. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2025.16203. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2025. PMID: 40693124 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Antibiotic Action, Drug Delivery, Biodegradability, and Wound Regeneration Characteristics of Surgical Sutures and Cutting-Edge Surgical Suture Manufacturing Technologies.J Funct Biomater. 2025 Apr 8;16(4):135. doi: 10.3390/jfb16040135. J Funct Biomater. 2025. PMID: 40278243 Free PMC article. Review.
-
How well do antibacterial sutures control microbial colonization after oral surgery?Evid Based Dent. 2025 Mar;26(1):44-45. doi: 10.1038/s41432-024-01069-5. Epub 2024 Sep 23. Evid Based Dent. 2025. PMID: 39313600
-
Imparting Antimicrobial Efficacy: Novel Polymer-Coated MgO Nanoparticles Transform Dental Composites.Int Dent J. 2025 Jul 28;75(5):100919. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2025.100919. Online ahead of print. Int Dent J. 2025. PMID: 40729840 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Pelz K, Tödtmann N, Otten JE. Comparison of antibacterial-coated and non-coated suture material in intraoral surgery by isolation of adherent bacteria. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2015;22(3):551–555. - PubMed
-
- Tabrizi R, Mohajerani H, Bozorgmehr F. Polyglactin 910 suture compared with polyglactin 910 coated with triclosan in dental implant surgery: randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;48(10):1367–1371. - PubMed
-
- Scaffaro R, Botta L, Sanfilippo M, Gallo G, Palazzolo G, Puglia AM. Combining in the melt physical and biological properties of poly(caprolactone) and chlorhexidine to obtain antimicrobial surgical monofilaments. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97(1):99–109. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical