Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 Mar 1;15(1):1896.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45784-0.

A phase I/IIa safety and efficacy trial of intratympanic gamma-secretase inhibitor as a regenerative drug treatment for sensorineural hearing loss

Collaborators, Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A phase I/IIa safety and efficacy trial of intratympanic gamma-secretase inhibitor as a regenerative drug treatment for sensorineural hearing loss

Anne G M Schilder et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Inhibition of Notch signalling with a gamma-secretase inhibitor (GSI) induces mammalian hair cell regeneration and partial hearing restoration. In this proof-of-concept Phase I/IIa multiple-ascending dose open-label trial (ISRCTN59733689), adults with mild-moderate sensorineural hearing loss received 3 intratympanic injections of GSI LY3056480, in 1 ear over 2 weeks. Phase I primary outcome was safety and tolerability. Phase lla primary outcome was change from baseline to 12 weeks in average pure-tone air conduction threshold across 2,4,8 kHz. Secondary outcomes included this outcome at 6 weeks and change from baseline to 6 and 12 weeks in pure-tone thresholds at individual frequencies, speech reception thresholds (SRTs), Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAE) amplitudes, Signal to Noise Ratios (SNRs) and distribution of categories normal, present-abnormal, absent and Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults/Elderly (HHIA/E). In Phase I (N = 15, 1 site) there were no severe nor serious adverse events. In Phase IIa (N = 44, 3 sites) the average pure-tone threshold across 2,4,8 kHz did not change from baseline to 6 and 12 weeks (estimated change -0.87 dB; 95% CI -2.37 to 0.63; P = 0.252 and -0.46 dB; 95% CI -1.94 to 1.03; P = 0.545, respectively), nor did the means of secondary measures. DPOAE amplitudes, SNRs and distribution of categories did not change from baseline to 6 and 12 weeks, nor did SRTs and HHIA/E scores. Intratympanic delivery of LY3056480 is safe and well-tolerated; the trial's primary endpoint was not met.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A.G.M. Schilder advises hearing industry on clinical trial design and delivery. A.S.B. Edge is a consultant and shareholder of Audion Therapeutics BV. L.M. Middelink is consultant to Audion Therapeutics BV. The remaining authors declare no competing interests

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Consort diagram phase I and IIa trial.
Patient disposition of phase I trial and phase IIa trial.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Mean pure-tone air-conduction thresholds in the treated ear of all patients that completed 12 weeks follow-up (N = 42).
Presented timepoints are baseline (black), 6 (blue) and 12 (red) weeks, error bars indicate standard deviations. Pure-tone thresholds are displayed in decibel hearing level (dB HL), frequency in kilohertz (kHz). Source data are provided as “supplementary data 4”.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Individual pure-tone audiograms (treated ear) of all patients that completed 12 weeks follow-up (N = 42).
Presented timepoints are baseline (black circle), 6 (blue cross) and 12 (red triangles) weeks. Frequencies not shown indicate that thresholds are beyond the maximum output of the audiometer. Pure-tone thresholds are displayed in decibel hearing level (dB HL), frequency in kilohertz (kHz). Source data are provided as “supplementary data 4”.

References

    1. Wilson BS, Tucci DL, Merson MH, O’Donoghue GM. Global hearing health care: new findings and perspectives. Lancet. 2017;390:2503–2515. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31073-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. www.who.int/publications/i/item/world-report-on-hearing.
    1. Cunningham LL, Tucci DL. Hearing Loss in Adults. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;377:2465–2473. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1616601. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wu PZ, O’Malley JT, de Gruttola V, Liberman MC. Age-related hearing loss is dominated by damage to inner ear sensory cells, not the cellular battery that powers them. J. Neurosci. 2020;40:6357–6366. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0937-20.2020. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dillon H, Day J, Bant S, Munro KJ. Adoption, use and non-use of hearing aids: a robust estimate based on Welsh national survey statistics. Int J. Audio. 2020;59:567–573. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1773550. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances