Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 1;24(1):95.
doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03361-5.

Comparison of cognitive workload and surgical outcomes between a three-dimensional and conventional microscope macular hole surgery

Aditya Kelkar  1 , S Natarajan  2 , Akshay Kothari  3 , Mounika Bolisetty  3
Affiliations

Comparison of cognitive workload and surgical outcomes between a three-dimensional and conventional microscope macular hole surgery

Aditya Kelkar et al. BMC Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Background: Performing a surgical task subjects the surgeon to multitudinal stressors, especially with the newer 3D technology. The quantum of cognitive workload using this modern surgical system in comparison to the Conventional microscope system remains unexplored. We evaluate the surgeon's cognitive workload and the surgical outcomes of macular hole(MH) surgery performed on a 3D versus a Conventional microscope operating system.

Methods: 50 eyes of 50 patients with MH undergoing surgery using the 3D or Conventional microscope visualization system. Cognitive workload assessment was done by real-time tools(Surgeons' heart rate [HR] and oxygen saturation[SPO2]) and self-report tool(Surgery Task Load Index[SURG-TLX] questionnaire) of three Vitreoretinal surgeons. Based on the SURG-TLX questionnaire, an assessment of the workload was performed.

Results: Of the 50 eyes, 30 eyes and 20 eyes underwent surgery with the Conventional microscope and the 3D system, respectively. No difference was noted in the MH basal-diameter(p = 0.128), total surgical-duration(p = 0.299), internal-limiting membrane(ILM) peel time(p = 0.682), and the final visual acuity (VA; p = 0.515) between the two groups. Both groups showed significant improvement in VA(p < 0.001) with a 90% closure rate at one-month post-surgery. Cognitive workload comparison, the intraoperative HR(p = 0.024), total workload score(P = 0.005), and temporal-demand dimension(p = 0.004) were significantly more in Conventional microscope group as compared to 3D group. In both the groups, the HR increased significantly from the baseline while performing ILM peeling and at the end.

Conclusion: The surgeon's cognitive workload is markedly reduced while performing macular hole surgery with a 3D viewing system. Moreover, duration of surgery including ILM peel time, MH closure rates, and visual outcomes remains unaffected irrespective of the operating microscope system.

Keywords: 3D viewing system; Cognitive workload; Conventional microscope; Macular Hole.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mohamed S, Claes C, Tsang CW. Review of small Gauge Vitrectomy: Progress and innovations. J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:6285869. doi: 10.1155/2017/6285869. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dhimitri KC, McGwin G, Jr, McNeal SF, et al. Symptoms of musculoskeletal disorders in ophthalmologists. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139(1):179–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.06.091. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hyer JN, Lee RM, Chowdhury HR, Smith HB, Dhital A, Khandwala M. National survey of back & neck pain amongst consultant ophthalmologists in the United Kingdom. Int Ophthalmol. 2015;35(6):769–75. doi: 10.1007/s10792-015-0036-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Honavar SG. Head up, heels down, posture perfect: Ergonomics for an ophthalmologist. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2017;65(8):647–50. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_711_17. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eckardt C, Paulo EB, HEADS-UP SURGERY FOR VITREORETINAL PROCEDURES: an experimental and clinical study. Retina. 2016;36(1):137–47. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000689. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources