Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May;17(5):e202300483.
doi: 10.1002/jbio.202300483. Epub 2024 Mar 2.

Real-time breast lesion classification combining diffuse optical tomography frequency domain data and BI-RADS assessment

Affiliations

Real-time breast lesion classification combining diffuse optical tomography frequency domain data and BI-RADS assessment

Shuying Li et al. J Biophotonics. 2024 May.

Abstract

Ultrasound (US)-guided diffuse optical tomography (DOT) has demonstrated potential for breast cancer diagnosis, in which real-time or near real-time diagnosis with high accuracy is desired. However, DOT's relatively slow data processing and image reconstruction speeds have hindered real-time diagnosis. Here, we propose a real-time classification scheme that combines US breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) readings and DOT frequency domain measurements. A convolutional neural network is trained to generate malignancy probability scores from DOT measurements. Subsequently, these scores are integrated with BI-RADS assessments using a support vector machine classifier, which then provides the final diagnostic output. An area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.978 is achieved in distinguishing between benign and malignant breast lesions in patient data without image reconstruction.

Keywords: breast cancer diagnosis; diffuse optical tomography; frequency domain optical systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Examples of DOT histograms for a malignant case (a) and (b), and a benign case (c) and (d). The perturbation values were averaged across all lesion files for each patient.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Combined classification scheme
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for testing data
FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.
Predicted probability of being malignant for matched and mismatched scenarios

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. In Cancer Facts & Figures 2022, American Cancer Society.
    1. Sprague BL, Arao RF, Miglioretti DL, Henderson LM, Buist DSM, Onega T, Rauscher GH, Lee JM, Tosteson ANA, Kerlikowske K. and Lehman CD, Radiology, 2017, 283, 59–69. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB, Lehrer D, Böhm-Vélez M, Pisano ED, Jong RA, Evans WP, Morton MJ, Mahoney MC, Larsen LH, Barr RG, Farria DM, Marques HS and Boparai K, Jama, 2008, 299, 2151–2163. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bakker MF, de Lange SV, Pijnappel RM, Mann RM, Peeters PHM, Monninkhof EM, Emaus MJ, Loo CE, Bisschops RHC, Lobbes MBI, de Jong MDF, Duvivier KM, Veltman J, Karssemeijer N, de Koning HJ, van Diest PJ, Mali WPTM, van den Bosch MAAJ, Veldhuis WB and van Gils CH, N. Engl. J. Med, 2019, 381, 2091–2102. - PubMed
    1. Zhu Q, Huang M, Chen N, Zarfos K, Jagjivan B, Kane M, Hedge P. and Kurtzman SH, Neoplasia, 2003, 5, 379–388. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources