Sexual Behavior and Perceived Risk for Oropharyngeal Cancer Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Psychometric Scale Validation

Abstract

Background: Men who have sex with men (MSM) are at increased risk for human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer (HPV-OPC). The objective of this analysis was to create a psychometrically validated scale to measure perception of risk for HPV-OPC.

Methods: We conducted an exploratory and a confirmatory factor analysis to determine and confirm the latent factor structure. We used a path diagram to evaluate the relationship between the validated scale and perceived risk for HPV-OPC. The model was determined to be a good fit if it met all criteria: root mean square error of approximation ≤0.06, standardized root mean residual ≤0.08, Comparative Fit Index ≥0.90, and Tucker-Lewis Index ≥0.90. We report standardized estimates and 95% confidence intervals.

Results: This cross-sectional study recruited 1315 MSM. A majority (73.33%) of MSM had performed fellatio on ≥20 partners, 36.98% had rimmed ≥20 partners, and 5.31% had performed cunnilingus on ≥10 partners in their lifetime.Six sexual history survey items loaded onto 2 latent factors: sexual risk behaviors: class 1 and sexual risk behaviors: class 2. The final model statistics indicated good fit: root mean square error of approximation = 0.064, standardized root mean residual = 0.059, Comparative Fit Index = 0.996, and Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.993. Sexual risk behaviors: class 1 was associated with greater perceived risk for HPV-OPC (0.217; 95% confidence interval, 0.138-0.295). Age, HIV status, HPV vaccination status, and sexual risk behaviors: class 2 were not associated with perceived risk for HPV-OPC.

Conclusion: Men who have sex with men assessed risk for HPV-OPC based on their lifetime number of cisgender male sexual partners, rimming partners, and fellatio partners but not other sexual behaviors. Men who have sex with men may be responsive to future HPV-OPC educational interventions and opportunities for screening.

Figure 1

Fitted path diagram with standardized estimates for the SEM. ***P < 0.0001.